Laserfiche WebLink
... <br />r <br />12/04/92 AFO report from 10\27\92 site inspection report arrives -numerous <br />issues of concern, most of which do not pertain to Phase II release <br />12/07j92 DMG public notice published in The Meeker Herald, thirty day public <br />comment period initiated <br />12/09/92 DMG responds to AFO inspection report concerns, requesu decision on <br />or before 01/02/93, the close of the thirty day public comment period, <br />ger AFO request, DMG sends copies of portions of the original bond <br />release application <br />12/16/92 AFO concerns about bond release discussed (Gary Fritz and myself) <br />during site inspection of Meadows #1 Mine <br />??? Steve Rathbun telephoned Larry Routten, said AFO would not concur, <br />discussed a number of issues not previously addressed in inspection <br />report: <br />• bond release areas combined versus separate <br />• DMG sampling data did not indicate revegetation <br />success <br />01/14/93 Gary Fritz telephoned me, reiterated issues previously discussed with <br />Larry Routten, requested DMG transmit facsimile of entire bond release <br />application, application is transmitted <br />01/15/93 Gary Fritz telephoned me, raised concern about sediment load <br />contribution demonsuations, asked for operator's submittal regarding <br />sediment loading in ponds -information is transmitted to Gary Fritz <br />01/27/93 AFO notifies DMG, in writing, that they will not concur with DMG <br />approval of bond release <br />• some areas at Northern #1 Mine which had been <br />excluded from Phase I bond release were included <br />in Phase II application <br />Steve Renner <br />2 <br />February Ol, 1993 <br />