My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV13153
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV13153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:24:09 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:39:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/21/1994
Doc Name
RUS EMPIRE COR
From
US DEPT OF INTERIOR
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR25
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />FEDERAL CANDIDATE SPECIES <br />Flannelmouth sucker Catostomus Iatipinnis <br />Roundtail chub Gila ro6usta <br />Based on your letter and on a telephone conversation with Martin Miller of <br />this office on November 17, 1994, we understand that the subject Technical <br />Revision involves the drilling of a single borehole on the 100-year floodplain <br />of the Yampa River. You stated that drilling of the borehole will require <br />drilling equipment to cross the Yampa River and that the applicant proposes to <br />cross at a riffle area used by a local rancher to move cows across the river. <br />You also stated that a drill pad will be constructed but that no trees will be <br />disturbed. <br />Because it is located within critical habitat for the Colorado squawfish and <br />within wintering habitat for the bald eagle, the project could affect these <br />species. In addition, if it involves a depletion of water, the project would <br />affect all of the listed fish species. The Fish and Wildlife Service believes <br />that major causes for the decline of the Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, <br />razorback sucker and bonytail include the effect of water depletion from the <br />Colorado River and its tributaries. We believe that any action made possible <br />by the project that causes a depletion of water from the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin should prompt a "may affect" finding for the listed fishes and <br />necessitate consultation under the Endangered Species Act. No information <br />concerning water depletion was included in your letter. <br />If the project does not involve a depletion of water, the implementation of <br />appropriate precautionary measures could result in a "not likely to adversely <br />affect" determination. The following are examples of such precautionary <br />measures. <br />1. All precautions shall be taken to prevent the entry of contaminants into <br />the river. All equipment must be cleaned and all oil leaks must be repaired <br />prior to crossing the river. Fuel tanks and other materials which must be <br />moved across the river must be moved on a truckbed or trailer (not on skids or <br />suspended by cables from equipment). All materials produced by drilling shall <br />be contained and prevented from entering the river. <br />2. The drilling pad shall not be located in a high flow channel or other area <br />inundated by high spring flows. <br />3. Disturbance to trees shall be avoided. Disturbance to understory <br />vegetation shall be minimized as much as possible. <br />The Service does not have any site specific wetland information for the <br />project area. We recommend that the area proposed for disturbance be <br />inventoried for wetlands. If wetlands are proposed to be disturbed, the <br />applicant should contact the Corps of Engineers regarding possible permit <br />requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.