My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE24232
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE24232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:33:08 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:39:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
2000 AHR
Violation No.
CV2001004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIiIIIIliilllli <br />999 <br />Foidel Creek Mine 2000 AHR <br />Submitted 02/0212001 <br />directed to Kent 02/05/2001 <br />Kent's initial review: 02/07/2001 <br />Kent identified missed sampling--or once looked at further-sampling was conducted on a schedule other <br />than that approved in the permit <br />02/07/2001 Janet called Steve Miller at TCC about this descrepancy. Steve was very adamant that the permit <br />requires quarterly sampling of all the surface sites. I directed him to Exhibit 14, Table A, and pointed <br />out the footnote #(1). He said that Rick Mills had told him that that table was in error and that he should <br />sample quarterly. <br />02/07!2001 Dan apprised of Kent's concerns <br />02/08/2001 Rick called me. He had spoken with Steve Miller, and Steve had alerted him to the sampling discrepancy. <br />Rick said, "TR-35 changed all that" and specifically changed the surface water sites to quarterly <br />sampling. I referred Rick to look at Exhibit 14, Table A, and the quarterly sampling applied only for sites <br />301, 69, and 1005. He said he will look at Table A. I noted that the approved Table A in the permit <br />is dated 4/11/00. <br />02/08/2001 Rick called back after reviewing Exhibit 14 Table A. he admitted that TCC had made a mistake. He <br />questioned whether or not it made more sense to sample all the sites quartely to keep them consistent <br />with the Trout Creek sampling? i.e. all sites sampled on the same squedule--so all surface water sites <br />sampled quarterly.His reasoning was that when the schedule had initially been setup for the March- <br />September TCC and DMG were focusing on the EC and the impact to flood irrigation. Now we are <br />focused on the downstream SO4 on lower Trout Creek and upper Trout creek. Issue is Jones well <br />downstream and 250 ppm SO4 surface stream standards. Rick would be willing to change all site <br />sampling to quarterly including in the winter, to have sampling consistant between all the sites. <br />02/09/2001 Kent provided second memo to Janet with further review of TCC AHR <br />02/09/2001 Discussed with Dan. Possible options the Division may take <br />Possible options DMG can give TCC. We will talk with Dave next week. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.