Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Welt <br />Page 7 <br />the revised pages. <br />5. The Division realizes that some of this information dates back <br />to the beginning of the permit, but it is important historical <br />information. Perhaps, MCC can develop a brief synopsis of these <br />out-of-date revisions to be included in the new document, rather <br />than include all the specific documents. The Division would like <br />to discuss this idea with MCC. <br />6. The CMLRD copy of Map 65-Mine Buffer Zone Map is missing from <br />the Division's copy of the new permit document. Please provide <br />this map. We do have Map 49-F Seam 40-year General Mine Plan. <br />7. This response is acceptable to the Division. Please provide <br />the revised page. <br />8. What is the reason the Water Augmentation Plan in Volume 2A, <br />Section 4.0 has been included in the new document as Exhibit 50 in <br />Volume 11 and the plan in Volume 14 (old volume) has not? <br />V. New Information <br />1. The Technical Revision in Volume 10, Appendix B-8, concerning <br />the Sylvester Gulch Fan should be included in the new document. <br />This information is necessary for bond calculations. If the <br />information is out of date it should be updated with as much <br />detail. <br />2. Volume 12A includes as a part of Technical Revision 53, the <br />studies that prove a variance from the Rule requiring at least 4 <br />feet of cover for a refuse pile. Since the Division has approved <br />this TR on the basis of these studies, this volume must be <br />maintained as part of the permanent record. If not as a permit <br />volume, perhaps to be included with the TR. <br />3. Is it MCC's intention to delete the Volume entitled "Adequacy <br />Responses"? This Volume should be maintained as well, since it is <br />essential to the permit renewal completed in 1986. <br />