My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV12893
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV12893
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:23:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:37:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/23/2002
Doc Name
Letter & Application
From
Montgomery Watson Harza
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
MR44
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
© Mr. Jm//rr Stark <br />Colonu/n Dit+itian afMineralr ~ Geology <br />Moy 31, 2002 <br />Poge 2 <br />In addition, the following text pages and map have been revised to include this road (copies of <br />revision materials accompany this transmittal for incorporation in the permit document): <br />• Page 2.03.40 (Revised Table 2, Affected Areas for Muting and Reclamation} <br />• Page 2.05.3-41 (Added Newlin Creek Road to list of light-use roads) <br />• Page 2.053-42 (Added Newlin Creek Road to text discussion of permanent roads) <br />• Pages 2.05.4-11 and 11a (Added reference and discussion for reclamation of Newlin Creek <br />Road) <br />• Page 2.05.5-4 (Revised text to reflect retention and transfer of Newlin Creek Road to <br />surface owner following reclamation) <br />• Page 4.03-6 (Clarified discussion of road location and design to reflect Newlin Creek <br />Road) <br />• Page 4.03-7 (Added Newlin Creek Road to text discussion of permanent hght-use roads) <br />• Map 30, Southfield Reclamation Plan (revised to include Newlin Creek Road) <br />It is important to note that, because the road is approved for permanent retention, the regulatory <br />requirements and performance standards for revegetation are not applicable. This consideration <br />was discussed with CDMG representatives Qim Stazk, Sandy Brown, and David Berry) during a <br />conference call on May 15~ and i[ cvas agreed that final Phase III bond release and release of <br />hability for the road would be contingent on inspection of the road and conEumation that the road <br />disturbance has remained erosionally stable. The timeframe for this verification was discussed and <br />it was agreed that a period of two to three years after completion of road reclamation should be <br />adequate to evaluate erosional stabihry. <br />In summary, we regret [hat misunderstanding of prior communications with the CDMG regarding <br />use of this road resulted in issuance of the NOV. We feel, however, that resolution of the <br />associated issues through our subsequent meetings and communications and submittal of this <br />abatement package consistent with the extended abatement deadline should effectively address the <br />associated regulatory issues. Rcdamation (drainage and surface stabilization) of the road <br />consistent with the approved reclamation plans, which was completed immediately following <br />completion of topsoil recovery and transport for redistribution on reclaimed areas, should address <br />associated environmental protection considerations. <br />'Y'T//iwq ('~L/l'x6~W.ti~e A/0.{frS3~0l~s. <br />~nm/u <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.