Laserfiche WebLink
The fill and drain were proposed to be constructed by dragline <br />utilizing a gravity segregation technique. Mine site personnel were <br />experienced at this technique according to the revision application. <br />The applicant had stated that the fill construction would be inspected <br />by a registered engineer or other qualified specialist at least <br />quarterly and during the required critical periods. However, because <br />of the type of dragline technique that would be employed to construct <br />the underdrain, the Division determined that inspections during the <br />actual placement should be more frequent. the primary purpose of more <br />frequent inspections during the time of construction was to assure that <br />the sandstone material was sized according to the permit. These <br />inspections would also assure that there was no contamination from <br />shale, coal or clay, and that the drain was being constructed to <br />function as designed. Therefore, a stipulation was attached to the <br />revision approval requiring that "A QUALIFIED REGISTERED ENGINEER SHALL <br />PERFORM INSPECTIONS AT LEAST BIMONTHLY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND <br />PLACEMENT OF THE UNDERDRAIN. RECORDS OF THE INSPECTIONS ARE TO INCLUDE <br />DATE, TIME, INSPECTOR AND OBSERVATION. COPIES SHALL BE RETAINED AT THE <br />MINE SITE. AFTER COMPLETION OF THE UNDERDRAIN CONSTRUCTION, COPIES OF <br />THESE INSPECTION REPORTS SHALL BE SEN7 TO THE DIVISION." The fill <br />underdrain inspections were conducted on a bimonthly basis and <br />inspection reports sent to the Division as required, thereby resolving <br />the stipulation. <br />The existing drainage in the area of the valley fill emptied into a <br />closed basin. Upon reclamation, PCC proposed to re-establish drainage <br />on the valley fill to flow to an existing channel and then into the <br />Wadge Impoundment. This would improve surface water drainage and act <br />to help eliminate seepage of water from the closed basin into adjacent <br />spoils. The channel had been designed to adequately handle flows, <br />however, velocities were determined to be high. Based upon erosion <br />occurring in the existing channel and the Division's flow velocity <br />calculations, erosion would be a problem in this channel. Therefore, a <br />stipulation was attached to the revision approval requiring that <br />"WITHIN 90 DAYS OF REVISION APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT A <br />DETAILED PLAN FOR EROSION CONTROL USING RIPRAP, EXCELSIOR MATTING OR <br />OTHER MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED DURING CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION." An <br />acceptable erosion control plan was received by the Division within the <br />required time frame, thereby resolving the stipulation. <br />Wadge Area <br />All areas affected by mining in the Wadge East pit, Wadge West pit, and <br />"Left open" Wadge pit will be returned to approximate original contour <br />as shown on Exhibit 12-g. The proposed post-mining contours shown on <br />Exhibit 12-9 were approved by the Division at the time of issuance of <br />the initial 5-year permit. The Division finds that the proposed <br />topography depicted on Exhibit 12-9 meets the requirements for <br />approximate original contour as defined by the Regulations for <br />operations to be conducted during the second permit term. <br />