Laserfiche WebLink
Matthew S. Hayes <br />June 28, 1989 <br />Page 2 <br />The word "silo" was corrected to the plural form in the last pazagraph on page <br />3-53. Other references to a single silo identified throughout the permit text have <br />been changed to 2 silos. <br />B. <br />1. This paragraph was inadvertently deleted from page 2-314A and has now <br />been added. <br />2. This sentence was originally deleted because the emissions permit for the <br />crusher had expired and would require re-application before it could be <br />installed. The sentence has now been revised stating such. <br />"II OQerations Description' <br />1. The acreage presented in Figure 1.6.A, Table 1.13.A and Table 1.13.B have <br />been revised to reflect total disturbed or affected acreages for the current <br />permit term (to 1991), including projected acreages. Previously, Figure <br />1.6.A showed actual acreages to date. <br />The acreages affected by mining in the F and B seams shown in Table <br />1.13.B overlap each other, especially during the current permit term (to <br />1991), and should not be added together to calculate the total affected <br />acres. The F seam affected acreage is inclusive of any B seam areas that <br />may be affected by mining. For the purpose of calculating the total <br />affected acreage, use only the F seam projected affected acres (1,506 acres) <br />as that affected by mining. Total affected acres would thus be 1,506 <br />acres plus 94 disturbed acres for a total of 1,600 acres as is shown in <br />Figure 1.6.A. <br />A typographical error on Figure 1.6.A in the number of privately owned <br />surface acres has been corrected. The total of private and Federal surface <br />acres owned equals the total acreage of the permit azea. The total of <br />private and Federal mineral acres owned also equals the total acreage of <br />the permit area. Because the surface and mineral estates of the land are <br />often sepazate, the number of privately owned and Federally owned acres <br />of mineral versus surface lands are not always equal. Such is the case at <br />WECC, where a majority of the mineral estate is Federally owned, but most <br />of the surface acreage is privately owned. <br />