Laserfiche WebLink
<br />gumhelii, S~mphoricarpor oreophilus, and Pious edulis. Thus, 6 species were found in the <br />affected area that exceeded 3% relative cover; five were shrub species and one was a tree species. <br />The highest relative cover was that of Quercus gambelii at 44.5%. Based on these results, the <br />following changes are in order: <br />1. The maximum allowable species diversity allowed for a species to apply toward the <br />standard should he raised from 40% to 44.5% which was the highest relative cover measured for a <br />species in the affected area. <br />2. A maximum of six species, rather than eight, should he required to have a relative <br />cover between 3% and 44.5%. <br />Rea~mmended species diversity standard: <br />Taking into consideration that: ]) the reclaimed area was planted with an emphasis on <br />herbaceous species rather than shrubs (shrub standard = 1500 stems/acre, far below the actual <br />affected area stem density of 7801 -see p. 32); and, 2) that the approved postmining land use is <br />rangeland/wildlife habitat, the present diversity standard on page 4-64 should be changed to the <br />following: <br />"Species diversity will he considered acceptable if sampling demonstrates that six <br />perennial, non-noxious plant species have been established and are contributing between 3 and <br />44.5% relative cover. At least two species should he cool season grasses and at least two should <br />he perennial fortis and/or shrubs. This standard will he acceptable for all areas (i,e., refuse pile, <br />truck dump, etc.)." <br />Baseline reference area and 1992 extended reference area multiple hit data for the <br />Mountain Shrubland Dry Phase community closely mirror the affected area results (see enclosed <br />charts 2 and 3). In each case, 6 species (mostly shrubs) contributed more than 3% relative cover. <br />Additionally, Quercus gamhelii averages 45.130 over those two studies. Thus, additional data <br />from similar areas of the same community are consistent with the conclusions that are based on the <br />affected area. <br />