My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE24022
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE24022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:33:01 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:35:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/3/1994
From
OSM
To
DMG
Violation No.
TD1993020370005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iuiiiiiiiiu iii <br />999 <br />Mr. Steven G. Renner <br />Coal Program Supervisor <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Renner: <br />"'"`' ~ 6 191 <br />.~~ z <br />JUN 31984 <br />Cir.`^;or, c; <br />Y <br />Thank you for your letter of February 14, requesting informal review of the <br />Albuquerque Field Office (AFO) Director's determination that your agency did <br />not take appropriate action with respect to ten-day notice (TDN) number <br />93-020-370-005 (Basin Resources, Inc., permit number C-81-013). <br />The TDN is based on a citizen complaint alleging that the permittee failed to <br />prevent or control adverse impacts to ground water systems, resulting in the <br />dewatering of a well owned by the complainant. The complainant maintains <br />that construction of an air shaft near his well caused it to go dry. <br />In your request for review, you assert that the AFO misinterpreted your <br />agency's handling of the citizen's allegation and the investigation that <br />followed. You cite Colorado Rule 5.02.5, which requires your agency to <br />conduct an investigation where the complainant provides sufficient basis <br />that a violation exists. You maintain that your investigation has not been <br />completed nor has a violation been proven, thus the TDN should not have <br />been issued. You state that if the investigation establishes a hydraulic <br />communication between the air shaft and the well production zone, your <br />agency would take appropriate action under Colorado Rule 4.04 (6) to <br />ensure replacement of the water supply. <br />You also note that the well was reported to be "non-functional" during a <br />permit amendment well inventory conducted in 1984 and that your <br />investigation has been hampered by the absence of readily-available well <br />construction information essential to making a cause and effect relationship <br />concerning water loss. Finally, you note that your agency has initiated <br />informal discussions with the mine operator and the landownerlcomplainant <br />with respect to a replacement water supply. <br /> <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />Feclamation and Enforcement <br />Washington. D.C. 20240 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.