REV12629

• Permit No: C1980005
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 8/3/1994
• Doc Name: SENECA II C-80-005 AND SENECA II W C-82-057 AVS
• From: DMG
• To: SUSAN BERGMAIER
• Type & Sequence: SO1
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

iii iiiiiiiiiiiuiii
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Shcnnan 51., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FA%:13031 832 8106
DATE: August 3, 1994
TO:
Susan Bergmaier
FROM: Erica Crosby
W
RE: Seneca II (C-80-005) & Seneca II-W (C-82-057)
AVS
~~~
DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL
RESOURCES
Roy Romer
Guvernrn
Ken Salazar
E.ecuuve Director
Michael B. LonK
Division Director
I reviewed the new ownership and control information submitted for
the Seneca II and Seneca II-W mines dated July 28, 1994. I also
conducted an AVS decision check, the system recommendation remains
at CONDITIONAL ISSUE. Please see attached for further detail. I
have one final concern that should be addressed by the operator;
1. The revised permit pages indicate the ownership relationship
tied to Seneca Coal Company. Parent companies are also listed
as Share holders and owners. The operator should specify the
percent of shares held by the company and the percent
ownership of one company to another. For example. Peabody
Holding Co,~ is listed as 1001 share holder in AVS. This 100
ownership should be listed in the permit pages. Another
example is that Hanson America Inc. and Hanson Holdings
Netherlands BV are both listed in the permit pages as owners
of HM Holdings Inc. In AVS, Hanson America is 84$ owner while
Hanson Holdings Netherlands BV owns only 14$. Percentages of
ownership should be listed in the permit pages.
That's all!
c:\avs\940803