My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV12561
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV12561
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:23:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:33:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/15/1998
Doc Name
1998 Midterm Review Findings Document
From
DMG
To
SENECA COAL CO
Type & Sequence
MT1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STIPULATION NO. S <br />WITHIN 180 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE AND PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF POND <br />011, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A TECHNICAL REVISION TO THE YOAST <br />PERMIT WHICH DEMONSTRATES THAT POND Ol 1 WILL BE LOCATED AS NEAR AS <br />PRACTICABLE TO THE DISTURBED AREA AND THAT THE POND EMBANKMENT <br />HAS A MINIMUM STATIC SAFETY FACTOR OF 13. <br />Stipulation 5 has been satisfied, the location acceptance documented in a letter dated 3-3-97 and <br />the static safety factor satisfied by approval of TR-06. <br />STIPULATION NO. 6 <br />WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A <br />TECHNICAL REVISION TO THE YOAST PERMIT ADDING A SURFACE WATER <br />MONITORING STATION TO GRASSY CREEK DOWNSTREAM FROM THE <br />CONFLUENCE OF GRASSY CREEK AND SCOTCHMANS GULCH. THE REVISION <br />SHALL ALSO ADDRESS MONITORING FREQUENCY AND PARAMETERS TO BE <br />MONITORED. <br />Stipulation 6 was satisfied by approval of TR-01. <br />STIPULATION NO.7 <br />PRIOR TO INITIATING ANY MINE RELATED DISTURBANCE IN THE SAGE CREEK <br />WATERSHED, THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE EVALUATION OF THE <br />PROBABLE HYDROLOGIC CONSEQUENCES OF PROPOSED MINING OPERATIONS IN <br />THE SAGE CREEK WATERSHED. THE EVALUATION SHALL ADDRESS POSSIBLE <br />MATERIAL DAMAGE IN TERMS OF POTENTIAL DEGRADATION OF WATER <br />QUALITY OR QUANTITY WHICH MIGHT RESULT IN IMPAIRMENT OF PRESENT <br />WATER USES WHICH CANNOT BE MITIGATED OR LONG-TERM IMPAIREMENT OF <br />EXISTING OR POTENTIAL WATER USES. <br />Stipulation 7 is still outstanding. Seneca Coal Company does not plan to mine into the Sage <br />Creek watershed until 2000. <br />STIPULATION NO.B <br />WITHIN 180 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE SENECA COAL COMPANY SHALL <br />PROVIDE THE DIVISION WITH A REVISION TO THE PERMIT TO DETERMINE THE <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS COVER STANDARD FOR CONCENTRATED SHRUB AREAS <br />BASED UPON REFERENCE AREA COMPARISON IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE <br />4.15.7(3)(D) AND RULE 4.15.8(3)(A)(ii). <br />Stipulation 8 was satisfied by approval of TR-02. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.