Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />' Oxidation processes initially oxidize cyanide to ryanate, CNO-. In some cas~s ryanate ion <br />is further oxidized to NH~+ and HC03 ; the ammonium ion may be fina~ly oxidized to <br />nitrogen gas. The three oxidation methods that hold the most promise for destruction of <br />cyanide are alkaline chlorination, sulfur dioxide/air (INCO Process), and hyd gen peroxide <br />(DeGussa Process). The alkaline chlorination process destroys cyanide by o 'dation by the <br />' hypochlorite ion and requires a pH of at least 10.5. It is the most develo d and widely <br />used oxidation method. However, disadvantages include the toxicity of resid al chlorine to <br />aquatic life, difficulty of handling chlorine, and preferential oxidation of thi ryanate. <br />The DeGussa Process destroys cyanide with hydrogen peroxide in the presen of a copper <br />catalyst. It is a simple process that is not particularly pH-dependent and d snot produce <br />' any toxic intermediates (HZOZ decomposes to OZ + HZO), and is applicabl to slurries as <br />well as liquids. However, hydrogen peroxide is quite expensive. <br />' The INCO Process uses sulfur dioxide and air in the presence of a copper cat lyst, to oxidize <br />free and WAD ryanide. The INCO process preferentially oxidizes the more toxic metallo- <br />' cyanide complexes ahead of the less toxic thioryanate. The process also ' obilizes heavy <br />metals by precipitation as hydroxides (this is true for the DeGussa Process swell) and is <br />applicable to both solutions and slurries. Disadvantages include: potentia mishaps with <br />' sulfur dioxide, necessity of maintaining the pH within a narrow range, and a tense must be <br />obtained and royalty fees paid in order to use the process. The INCO Proce s will be used <br />at the Battle Mountain facility for cyanide destruction. According to Battle ountain Gold, <br />' high naturally-occurring levels of copper in the ore will obviate the need for a copper <br />catalyst. <br />' 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK <br />' 3.1 Length and Nature of Contract i <br />The contract would be one year in length (October 1992 -September 19 3) and would <br />' involve three samplings in the first quarter, two samplings in the second qu rter, and two <br />samplings in the second half, for a total of seven samplings. Depending on an lyrical results, <br />it is possible that the sampling frequenry could either increase or decrease. <br />' The contract would be with Battle Mountain Gold, but all reporting would be directly to the <br />' Contract Administrator at the Mined Land Reclamation Division or, in hi absence, the <br />Reclamation Specialist in charge of the Battle Mountain Gold-San Luis pe 't. <br />1 <br />' RCG/Hagier, Bailty, Inc. <br /> <br />