Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />--- Timber) ine Enterprises <br />- "The Alma Placer', <br />File No. 78-42 <br />Proposed Finds gs of Fact and Conclusions of Law Exhibit A <br />I. Findings of Fact <br />A. On January 29, 1982, a foreclosure deed t nsferred ownership of the <br />property known as the Alma Placer from Mr. rdon Reid to the Ducommon <br />Business Trust. Since ~~imberline Enterpri es, the operator of the Alma <br />Placer, permit number 7842, had secured he legal right-to-enter the <br />permit area by virtue of a lease from M Reid, Attorney General's <br />representative, Janice Burn tt de term' ed that Timberline Enterprises <br />had lost the legal right-to-~nter th Alma Placer. <br />B. On May 24, 1984, the Mined <br />- cause to believe that violati <br />- Timberline Enterprises, inabil <br />Placer to do reclamation. / <br />Reclamation Board found reasonable <br />the permit had occurred due to <br />enter the permit area of the Alma <br />C. On June 27, 1984, the,Fiined Land `Reclamation Board, during a formal <br />public hearing, found Ti erline Enterprises to be in violation of <br />subparagrap ~~3 of pars aph 5 of permit number 78-42 under the heading, <br />"WITNESSETH~, which p ovides in pertinent part: <br />"3) the pr <br />out in conf <br />as amended, <br />II. Conclusions <br />o~ed mining operations <br />Hance with the requires <br />..' <br />Law <br />reclamation can be carried <br />of C.R.S. 1973, 34-32-116, <br />~\ <br />Based upon the;~indings of Fact and pursuant to C.R.S.\34-32-124(6)(a), <br />Timberline Enterprises has been found to be in violation of its permit by the <br />Board, and~ne Board is thus exercising its prerogative to revoke permit <br />number 78~ 2. ~~ <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION.BOARD <br />/ph <br />Doc. No. 2317 <br />Dickey Lee Hullinghorst, Chairman <br />