Laserfiche WebLink
D04155GE <br />Due to the height and steepness of the talus slopes at this site we do not feel that there is a <br />technically viable concept to mitigate the observed conditions. We do feel that there are some <br />cautionary steps that can be taken to reduce the potential for the public to be exposed to hazardous <br />conditions. The current use of the area is for material and equipment storage for the San Juan <br />County Road Department and is closed to the public. Evidence of limited rockfall activity was <br />observed at the site, therefore we feel that the area along the toe of the slope should remain closed <br />to the public. <br />We suggest that a berm and rock catchment trench be constructed along the toe of the slope to <br />reduce the potential for rocks striking. stored equipment and materials at the site. The trench should <br />be about ten (10) feet wide with a berm about eight (8) to ten (10) feet tall. The trench should be <br />constructed so that water does not accumulate in the bottom of the trench. The slopes of the berm <br />should have inclinations of about two to one (2:1, horizontal to vertical) and flatter. The material <br />within the berm should be moisture conditioned and compacted to at least ninety (90) percent of <br />maximum dry density as defined by ASTM D 1557, modified Proctor test. <br />Although we feel that it is relatively unlikely that a rapid catastrophic failure of the slope supporting <br />the roadway will occur, we do feel that it is prudent to place warning signs above and below the <br />subject azea to wam travelers of a potential for rapid failure of the roadway support materials. <br />5.0 POST DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS <br />The project geotechnical engineer should be consulted during construction of the project to observe <br />site conditions and open excavations during construction and to provide materials testing of soil <br />during the berm construction. <br />This subsurface soil and foundation condition study is based on limited sampling; therefore, it is <br />necessary to assume that the subsurface conditions do not vary greatly from those encountered in the <br />field study. Our experience has shown that significant variations aze likely to exist and can become <br />appazent only during additional on site excavation. For this reason, and because of our familiarity <br />with the project, Lambert and Associates should be retained to observe foundation excavations prior <br />to foundation construction, to observe the geotechnical engineering aspects of the construction and to <br />be available in the event any unusual or unexpected conditions aze encountered. The cost of the <br />geotechnical engineering observations and material testing during construction or additional <br />engineering consultation is not included in the fee for this report. We recommend that your <br />construction budget include site visits early during construction schedule for the project geotechnical <br />engineer to observe foundation excavations and for additional site visits to test compacted soil. <br />We recommend that the observation and material testing services during construction be retained by <br />the owner or the owner's engineer or architect, not the contractor, to maintain third party credibility. <br />We are experienced and available to provide material testing services. We have included a copy of a <br />~-12TYTt~TE2 ~ tIYC~i ~S~IICCFS~ES <br />CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS AND <br />'$- MATERIALS TESTING <br />