Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Memo to Steve Shuev 2 June 15.1998 <br />ground-water quality shall be maintained for each pazameter at whichever of the following <br />levels is less restrictive: <br />(A) existing ambient quality as of January 31, 1994, or <br />(B) that quality which meets [he most stringent criteria set forth in Tables 1 through 4 of <br />"The Basic Standards for Ground Water." <br />As discussed previously, the 9360 adit water is contaminated beyond the criteria set forth in the Basic <br />Standards for Ground Water. However, there is currently insufficient information available to compare <br />the 9360 adit water quality to existing ambient quality as of January 31, 1994, and it is towazd <br />characterizing ambient quality that the Operator's efforts should be directed. <br />An acceptable procedwe for characterizing ambient ground water quality relative to the 9360 adit <br />water would be to drill a monitoring well or wells into the formation above the 9360 adit from which <br />the inflows to the adit are derived. Ground water samples collected from such wells would be <br />acceptable to the Division as representative of water quality on January 31, 1994 because there have <br />been no new or increased sowces of ground water contamination initiated in the azea in question <br />subsequent to that date. The Operator's current hydrogeologic model for the formation above the 9360 <br />adit is that no continuous static water table will be present. As such, the drilling targets will have to be <br />carefully designed to maximize the potential for collection of a water sample representative of the <br />water that eventually percolates through the formation and drips or flows into the 9360 adit. If <br />representative sampling of water from the superjacent formation indicates that water quality is similar <br />to 9360 adit water, then the Division can approve closing the valve on the concrete bulkhead seal and <br />forcing reinfiltration to the formation of the 9360 adit water. If, on the other hand, sampling of the <br />superjacent formation ground water reveals water quality is superior to the 9360 adit water, this would <br />be regarded as evidence that the presence of the adit is causing degradation of water quality, and a <br />ground water protection program would have to be established in accordance with Rule 3.1.7 before <br />the valve on the concrete bulkhead could be closed. The essential elements of any such program would <br />be to asswe that the Interim Narrative Standard for ground water is achieved at some point o[ points of <br />compliance. <br />There are a number of mechanisms that could contribute to the adit being the causative agent for <br />ground water contamination. These include: <br />The presence of the adit would modify ground water flow paths and flow rates by acting as a <br />ground water drain. Even if the adit were to be plugged, this effect could potentially persist if <br />the adit were to seasonally refill and drain in response to snowmelt. <br />The driving of the adit and subsequent caving have caused and increase in rock surface area <br />exposed to weathering. <br />