My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE23574
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE23574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:47 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:28:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/3/1983
Doc Name
Proposed Civil Penalty
From
MLRD
To
Snowmass Coal Company
Violation No.
CV1982089
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br />2. Duration of Damage: No damage has occurred to date. If the <br />embankment failed, damage would last from several weeks to several <br />months, depending on the time of year. <br />3. Extent of Uamage: No damage has occurred to date. If the <br />embankment failed, the sediment, refuse, and resultant erosion <br />would directly enter North Thompson Creek. <br />Sediment would affect aquatic life through suffocation and or toxic <br />effects. The deposition would alter the immediate floodplain and <br />possibly alter the natural meander of the stream. Finally the <br />sediment could affect downstream water users by clogging irrigation <br />systems, as most of Thompson Creek is diverted for irrigation below <br />the mine. <br />Based on the above three categories I judge the seriousness of the <br />violation to fall between moderate and high and assess a penalty of <br />$1,500.00. <br />Rule 5.04.5(2)(c) - Fault <br />Fault is divided into three separate units and carries a maximum penalty <br />of $1,500.00. <br />If the violation was unavoidable despite the exercise of reasonable <br />care no assessment for fault will be made. <br />2. if a violation occurred because of negligence, i.e. due to <br />indiffernece, lack of diligence, or lack of reasonable care, an <br />assessment of at least $250.00 but not more than $750.00 will be <br />made. <br />3. If a violation occurred because of reckless knowing or intentional <br />conduct, an assessment of at least $750.00 but not more than <br />$1,500.00 will be made. <br />Problems with the pond have been noted as early as 1979. The operator <br />took nearly two years to arrive at an acceptable design. Even after the <br />design was approved, the operator could not complete construction within <br />a four month period. For a complete history of this issue see the <br />attached memo from Robert Liddle. <br />The operator was negligent in not completing the pond. The operator is <br />assessed $750.00. <br />The total penalty assessed is as follows: <br />History: $ -0- <br />Seriousness: $1,500.00 <br />Fault: $ 750.00 <br />Total $2,250.00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.