My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV11754
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV11754
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:22:43 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:25:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985029
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/4/1990
Doc Name
MEMO-FN M-85-029 RECLAMATION RESOURCES INC-ALMA PLACER PERMIT AMENDMENT-HYDROLOGIC REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
LARRY OEHLER
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Larry Oehler - 8 - <br />and certified by a qualified registered professi~ <br />Certification of the constructed water managemen• <br />be forwarded to the Division within 30 days of a <br />6. Buffer Zones for Permanent Structures <br />April 4, 1990 <br />ial engineer. <br />system shall <br />ipl eti on. <br />The applicant has specified a 200-foot buffer zone from th buried <br />Colorado Springs water pipeline for excavations in the Sou Central, <br />South, and East Phases. The Division commends Reclamation Resources for <br />this commitment. <br />The applicant has also specified a 50-foot buffer zone fr the Columbia <br />Ditch. The Division requests that Reclamation Resources r fer to the <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act regarding permanent st uctures and <br />respond accordingly. Section 34-32-115(4)(d) of the Color do Mined Land <br />Reclamation 101, et seq., C.R.S.) states that: <br />"The Board shall not deny a permit, except for one or ore of the <br />following reasons: <br />(d) The mining operation will adversely affect the stabili of any <br />significant, valuable, and permanent man-made structur s located <br />within two hundred feet of the affected land, except w re there is <br />an agreement between the operator and the persons havi g an interest <br />in the structure that damage to the structure is to be compensated <br />for by the operator". <br />7. Water Diversion <br />An existing diversion from the Columbia Ditch and buried pipe is <br />indicated in Plate 2. Please provide a discussion of the iversion <br />including diversion design, flow capacity, materials used in <br />construction, and proposed location. <br />8. Alma WWTP <br />Please identify and discuss the Alma WWTP shown on Plate 2. <br />Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan <br />1. Excess Tailings <br />The applicant has proposed to back fill excavations with tailings. The <br />material swell factor (estimated at 60 percent) should be erified so <br />that a materia7.balance can be developed. Will the excess "spoil" <br />material be used to backfill depressions within the permit boundary to <br />create a gently sloping southwest facing landform? Will t excess spoil <br />~ material be used to enhance reclamation of historic mining isturbance <br />outside the 200-acre permit boundary? The Division prefers these <br />practices rather than the creation of a tailings pile. P1 se address. <br />- - -~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.