My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV11708
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV11708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:22:40 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:25:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/1985
From
OSM
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
PR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />IN [L)LY l[/[[ TO <br />United States Department of the Interior' : ' 3465 <br />BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT' '; `!';! i' "' C~7-129) <br />D:lS44569 <br />MONTROSE DISTRICT OFFICE, _, C-0117192 <br />2465 SOUTH TOWNSEND ~ C-1362 <br />MONTROSE, COLORADO 81402 <br />JAN ~ 1985 <br />Memorandum <br />To: Deputy Administrator, Western Service Center, Office of Surface <br />Mining <br />Attention: Steve Parsons <br />From: District Manager, Montrose <br />Subject: Application for Revision to Mining and Reclamation Plan for <br />Mt. Gunnison No. 1 Mine, Arco Coal Co. <br />The Grand Junction Branch of Solid Minerals has reviewed the one volume Miae <br />Plan Revision Application submitted December 17, 1984. West Elk Coal Company <br />proposes to extend a portion of the current 5-year permit area both to <br />accommodate a revision to the underground mining sequence and permit the <br />relocation of the subsidence teat panel. <br />With regard to the revision of the mining sequence, the larger barrier pillars <br />are acceptable in view of long-term stability of the main entries and <br />shouldn't result in reduced overall coal recovery if pulled on final retreat. <br />The change of panel entry pillar dimensions from 82 ft by 82 ft to 52 ft by <br />82 ft is acceptable and will increase overall recovery. Questions with regard <br />to the mining plan revisions are ae follows: <br />1. What is the revised panel entry barrier pillar width? <br />2. What ie meant by Figure 27 Panel Entry System is not clear. <br />Is the stippled area marked ae "To Be Mined on Retreat" the only <br />area in the panel entries where pillar recovery will take place, <br />or will both development of the entries and recovery of the pillars <br />take place in these 2 entries simultaneously? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.