Laserfiche WebLink
.. ._. <br />'. P..intiffs James and Ann 1 alum, hereinafter "TATUM" initiated this litigation by filing <br />+heir complaint against the Defendant Basin Resources, Inc., hereinafter "BRI". Tatum asserts <br />the fol-owing claims: <br />First, that BRI breached a certain contract dated June 1,1988 (Plaintiffs Exhibit ICIC, <br />attached) wherein it (BRn agreed to trade certain water rights. (Maxwell Ditch trade). <br />Second, that BRI breached a certain oral agreement entered into between the parties at <br />around the same time, to trade a second water right. (Consolidated Ditch trade). <br />Third, Tatum claims that underground mining operations conducted by the defendants <br />have damaged their property, including the residence alternatively referred to during the trial <br />as the "Erickson House", the "Tatum Residence", and "Solitario". Tatum claims chat mining <br />operations near or under their property caused substantial structural damage to the residence <br />and•that the cause was subsidence resulting from mining operations. <br />Finally, Tatum asserts that BRI further damaged their property by installing a ventilation <br />shaft and fan on their property which had the effect of causing a.well on than nn.rin++ ~o ~'- - <br />property t0 dry up, and also rendering a portion of his ;w.,...__..~..,;... r MVw... .... .. .;Nr V.....~.(+L.:.. <br />for punitive damages, which the Court dismissed at the and of Plaintiffs' case, and for attorney <br />fees. <br />Defendant, while acknowledging the enforceability of the June 1,1988 Agreement, <br />interprets the contract in a manner different than Tatum; their interpretation preventing tree <br />implementation of any agroement to exchange the use of water rights, Defendant also denies <br />the existence of any agreement to convey water rights on the Consolidated Ditch, denies <br />causing any subsidence damage to plaintiffs property, and disagrees with Tatum as to the <br />damages caused by use of their property for conshuction of a certain ventilation shaft. <br />p¢reement To Exchange Water Rights-Maxwell Ditch: In early 1988, Wyoming Fuel <br />Company experienced underground production problems in their mining operations involving <br />excess gas, excess water, and soft floors that severely threatened their ability to meet prod- <br />uction and mine safety requirements. In order to commence addressing those problems and <br />in order to avoid a lengthy delay to obtain a permit, Wyoming Fuel Company negotiated <br />with Tatum for waiver of a certain waiting period required by Colorado Revised Statutes <br />3433.101 et,seq. Wyoming Fuel Company entered into an Agreement with Tatum to exchange <br />