My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE23257
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE23257
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:38 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:23:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/30/1993
Doc Name
Memo
From
DMG
To
MICHAEL B LONG
Violation No.
CV1993025
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiniiiiiiiiiiii~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Sl., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80201 <br />Phone:13031 866-3567 <br />FA%: 1303) 8328106 <br />DATE: August 30, 1993 <br />TO: Michael B. Long, Director <br />FROM: Susan Burgmaier~ <br />RE: Edna Strip Mine (C-80-001) <br />Notice of Violation C-93-024 <br />Notice of Violation C-93-025 <br />Notice of Violation C-93-026 <br />oe cow <br />ti`v R <br />~~ -, b <br />'o <br />.~g. <br />~ /e]6 ~ <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B Long <br />Dn•ison Director <br />We have received, from the Pittsburg and Midway Coal Mining Company, a request to extend <br />the abatement periods for the above mentioned notices of violation. The request was to <br />extend the deadlines to October 17, 1993. The original abatement due dates were ninety days, <br />ending July 4, 1993. We extended the abatement periods an additional sixty days to <br />September 2, 1993. I notified P&M that we would not extend the deadlines beyond October <br />2, 1993, the end of a second ninety day period from issuance. We are currently awaiting a <br />response to our adequacy concerns on two technical revisions, the approval of which would <br />facilitate on the ground abatement of the notices. I believe P&M is eligible for an extension <br />based on Rule 5.03.2(2((c)(i), in that they continue to diligently pursue approval of the <br />required revisions. Therefore, I am requesting that you authorize the attached extension <br />forms. I have attached P&M's request and the Division's initial response for your review. If <br />you need additional information, please let me know. <br />SLB\083093.WP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.