My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE23224
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE23224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:37 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:22:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
4/12/1993
Doc Name
REVISED MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES INC
From
PARCEL MAURO HULTIN & SPAANSTRA PC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DEAN R. MASSEY <br />• III IIIIIIIIIIIII III ~ <br />PARCEL, MAURO, HULTIN & SPAANSTRA, P.G. <br /> ATTORNEYS AT UW <br /> SUITE J600 <br /> IBOI ULIFORNIA STREET <br /> DENVER. COLORA00 80202 <br /> TELEPHONE pOJ1292~6a00 <br /> TELECOPIER IJ031295 JO<O <br />April l2, 1993 <br />g[~CEIUEG <br />VIA MESSENGER & FACSIMILE <br />Dr. James Pendleton <br />Colorado Division of Minerals & Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Suite 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Revised Memorandum of Understanding <br />Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. <br />Dear Dr. Pendleton: <br />APR 121993 <br />Division of ilninerals 8 ~aology <br />Enclosed with this letter you will find a draft of the MOU which has been revised in <br />accordance with the language you forwarded to me in your letter dated March l2. In <br />addition to the changes you proposed in that letter, I would point out twb issues which <br />require your attention: <br />1. As I indicated in my telephone conversation with you shortly rafter receiving <br />your letter, we have accepted your proposed language regarding samplin frequency in <br />paragraph A.1. However, I have been advised by Battle Mountain represent Lives that they <br />have not been contacted by the contractor to schedule a sampling event. As I read the <br />revised language, assuming that the Contract was executed on October 19, suQh event should <br />be undertaken no later than April 19 to ensure that two samples have been dbtained during <br />the three month period which runs from January 19 to April 19. Please make the necessary <br />arrangements to ensure compliance with the amended document and give mg a call if there <br />are any problems in this regard. <br />2. In addition to the changes you proposed in your letter, the enclosed draft <br />contains an editorial correction in the original document regarding the propet surface water <br />monitoring station to be sampled under the MOU (ie. RS-5). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.