My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV11300
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV11300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:22:17 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:22:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
3.0 ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL MINES
Type & Sequence
TR53
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />has been protected from the refuse by wood berms. <br />The refuse pile is in a benched configuration and is <br />extending upward. Chemical analysis of the refuse material is <br />presented in Table 4. All of the parameters analyzed are <br />considered non-toxic for revegetation. Old slopes on the site are <br />at a ratio of one horizontal to one vertical with the new portion <br />at a ratio of two horizontal to one vertical. Reclamation of the <br />refuse pile is progressing up slope, a couple of lifts behind the <br />dumping of new refuse. Six to twevle inches of topsoil is placed <br />over the refuse material. <br />• Vegetation test plots were established on each lift and <br />1 <br />correspond to a year of reclamation activities. Soil cover in <br />all areas was generally six to twelve inches. In 1983, vegeta- <br />tion was sampled on the various terraces to determine cover and <br />production. This analysis indicated that the revegetation success <br />criteria could be met on the refuse disposal area utilizing only <br />7 to 12 inches of cover. Recommendations of this study included: <br />utilizing as much soil cover as possible, with 12 inches being <br />sufficient for revegetation success; utilization of native <br />species adapted for high altitude; uniform topsoil replacement <br />depth; and limiting the slope to 2(h):1(v). <br />The CMLRD has agreed with this analysis and has granted a <br />variance for the 4 foot cover requirement by stating in the <br />3-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.