Laserfiche WebLink
<br />iii iiiiiuiniii iii <br />999 <br />United States Department of the Interior ~" <br />~_ <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE h1lNING <br />RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT ~ <br />SUITE 310 <br />625 SILVER AVENUE. S.W. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ <br />In y ftt To: <br />ALBUQUERQUE, NEW ME?CIGO 87102 <br />Pugust 28, 1990 <br />CERTIFIID M4iL RECEIPT NO.: P 965 798 991 <br />AUG 3 0 1990 <br />Mined Land <br />Reclamation Civisi:;n <br />Perna t : C-81-008 <br />Mine Name: Nucla <br />Mr. Dan Mathews <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Mathews <br />The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) <br />inspection report identifies a violation that is considered to have <br />existed at the time of the previous State complete inspection but had <br />not been cited. <br />Date of Federal Inspection: 8/16/90 pate of LSCI: 6/12/90 <br />The determination that the State did not cite the violation is based on <br />one or mire of the following reasons: <br />The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no <br />State enforcerrent action was taken. <br />Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a <br />structure in existence as of the last colrglete inspection (sediment <br />pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). <br />~_Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last <br />complete State inspection have not been established (diversion <br />ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, <br />etc.). <br />~_Site conditions indicate that the violation noted had been in <br />existence at the time of, or prior to, the last complete State <br />inspection. <br />