Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLOWYO COAL COMPANY L.P. <br />5731 State Highway 13 <br />Meeker, Colorado 87641 <br />(970)624-1572 <br />(970) 824-1598 FAx <br />James A. Kilter <br />Senior Environmental Engineer <br />iiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiii <br />/~ neni:v~,~,~t <br />.Energy ,__ <br />COi~O COO~COttlPOfly f,.~. ~ .~q, <br />RECEIVED <br />January 27, 1998 <br />Mr. Byron Walker <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver Colorado 80203 <br />JAN 2 9 1998 <br />Division of Minerals 8 Geology <br />Re: Colowyo Coal Company (Permit No. C-81-019) <br />Technical Revision No. 44 <br />Response to January 22, 1998, Division Adequacy Correspondence <br />Dear Mr. Walker: <br />Colowyo has the following comments concerning the Division's January 22, 1998 <br />correspondence regarding our TR-44 (Section 16 Fill Monitoring and Blasting Records <br />Modification) application. <br />For many years Colorado coal operators have received frequent guidance regarding the <br />requirements for the processing of permit revisions, technical revisions (TR's), minor revisions, <br />permit renewals, etc. The Division's January 22, 1998 letter regarding TR-44 indicates that the <br />proposed public notice accompanying the TR application should contain a description of the <br />entire permit boundary rather than the less complicated description of the specific area affected <br />by the application. Colowyo believes this recommendation is inconsistent with past Division <br />guidance and is contrary to both the Rules and the Statute. <br />The Division has never indicated that the public notices for TR's should include, nor has the <br />interpretation of the CDMG Rules been that a complete description of the permit boundary was <br />required. As such, we ask that the Division reconsider its request for inclusion of a complete <br />description of the complete permit boundary in TR's <br />CDMG Rule 2.07.3(2) is somewhat ambiguous with respect to the issue of what is required for <br />TR's versus the requirements for new permit applications, permit renewals and permit revisions. <br />The Division's past interpretation of CDMG Rule 2.07.3(2) (and subsequent guidance to <br />Colowyo) has been to consider this section of the Rules as containing two distinct subsections. <br />The first sentence of the section addresses, in general terms, requirements regarding the <br />submission of new permits, permit revisions, technical revisions and permit renewals. With <br />regard to "technical revisions' the interpretation has been that the Rule merely requires that the <br />Public notice should contain the 1) ownership; 2) precise location and 3) boundaries of the land <br />to be affected by the proposed surface mining operation. Colowyo's proposed public notices for <br />all TR's, as well as TR-44, have reflected these requirements. <br />It is not until the second sentence of Rule 2.07.3(2) that the Rules specify in more detail what is <br />required with respect to the public notice. However, the second sentence of the Rule is quite <br />specific and addresses onl new permits, permit revisions and permit renewals. Very clearly, <br />this section of the Rule specifically excludes any reference to "technical revisions." <br />