My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22987
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:18:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988101
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/23/1991
Doc Name
FONDIS PIT PN M-88-101 BOARD ORDER
From
MLRD
To
ELBERT CNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />BEFORE THE MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />NOV No. M-91-086 <br />FINAL ORDER <br /> <br />IN THE MATTER OF: ELBERT COUNTY, PERMIT NO. M-88-101 <br />This matter came before the Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />("Board") for a hearing on August 21 and September 18, 1991. The <br />Hoard hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions <br />of law, and enters the following order. <br />1. Pursuant to the Stipulation between Elbert County ("the <br />county") and the Mined Land Reclamation Division, a copy of which <br />is attached and incorporated by reference, the county does not <br />contest, and the Board hereby finds, the following violations: <br />a. Failure to stabilize and protect the outslope of the <br />berm as required by §34-32-116(7)(1) and Technical Revision <br />No. 1. <br />b. Failure to protect areas outside of the affected area <br />from damage as required by §34-32-116(7)(h). <br />c. Construction of a unpermitted road crossing in viola- <br />tion of the provisions of the permit. <br />2. Pursuant to §34-32-124(6), upon a finding that a viola- <br />tion of a permit provision has occurred, the Board may suspend <br />the permit. <br />3. The Board has been asked to revoke the permit for fail- <br />ure to identify certain mineral rights claimed by other individu- <br />als in its permit application. The county has claimed that the <br />interests held by such other individuals do not include an inter- <br />est in the sand and gravel. The question of whether the mineral <br />rights, if any, reserved to the other individuals includes an <br />interest in the mineral being mined presents a property rights <br />dispute. The Board declines to decide this issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.