My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-04-26_REVISION - M1978056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1978056
>
2004-04-26_REVISION - M1978056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:45:09 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:18:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/26/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Varra Companies Inc.
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
expected at any one time throughout the remainder of the operation in terms of acreage and linear <br />feet of pit disturbance, and acreage of other disturbances. (As an alternative, VCI may propose <br />the number of linear feet of pit disturbance and acreages for all existing and planned disturbances <br />(185.23 acres of affected land) minus disturbed slopes and/or acreage already reclaimed to <br />desired final reclamation conditions and deemed ready for reclamation responsibility release by <br />the Division of Minerals and Geology.) Pease respond. <br />Exhibit L -Reclamation Costs, details the extent of disturbance for each area shown on Exhibit C <br />-Mining Plan Map. As indicated in the summary overview on page 1 of Exhibit L, Maximum <br />Disturbance was reached shortly before the succession of operators in 1999. Since each act of <br />extraction and concurrent grading and reclamation is trending to lower the reclamation and extent <br />of disturbance provided for under each area, the actual liability will progressively decrease from <br />that detailed at the time of the Amendment submittal, and can be reassessed at the completion of <br />each phase. <br />Since maximum disturbance is defined per area shown on Exhibit C - it is difficult to reassign <br />and reorder the magnitude of disturbance as requested. The point of the Exhibit L calculations is <br />to create order to nearly 20 yeazs of operations for which no order or sequence of extraction was <br />established. We respectfully request the Division to follow the sequences and areas defined <br />under Exhibit L -and trust you will see that each area of disturbance can be tracked progressively <br />from this point forward. <br />You will note first that unaffected lands, in-situ and stockpiled soils, Facility locations and access <br />roads were distinguished from all other affected lands. Then Tracts A through D were detailed. <br />All aspects of accounting were then detailed, including perimeter areas of definable slopes for <br />tract D and the ponded areas of Tract C. These summaries attempt to distinguish definable aeeas <br />used later in financial warranty determinations. The Exhibit breaks down the application of <br />exposed ground water to the approved SSP. This component relates both extraction and fill <br />activities over time to meet the water obligations of the location. Water relates extraction in each <br />area over time. Following Water, each definable area is accounted for in detail for costs related <br />to Dewatering, Grading and Soil Preparation. Soil demand and Recoiling of each Area is <br />followed by an examination of Revegetation costs, followed by related mobilization and <br />demobilization costs. This examination per area is a study of mining and reclamation over time <br />based upon the current level of distwbance, as the Maximum level of disturbance. As each vear <br />of minin¢ and concurrent reclamation progresses, the actually financial warranri liability of the <br />6. In conformance with Rule 6.44, please clarify the current or planned volume, whichever is <br />greater, of stockpiled overburden that will need to be backfilled into the pit during final <br />reclamation, and provide the average push/haul distance to move the stockpiled overbwden into <br />the pit. (The volume of overburden that will be used to backfill Tract D may be excluded from <br />this volume estimate.). Please clazify. <br />None. No stockpiled overburden will be necessary to the establishment of completed slopes. All <br />calculations were based upon a cut, fill, or cut/fill basis using a volume graphic applied to each <br />unique area of the mine. For example, while the complete fill of Area D is provided for in the <br />mine plan, grading of Area D is also included in the calculations, as a cost above and beyond to <br />provide for this contingency should default occur prior to completion of the fill. The grading <br />along the existing pond, along with related dewatering costs, is also provided for on the basis of a <br />Varra Companies, Inc. M1978-056 Durham Sand & Gravel Pit - 2003 Amendment - <br />Monday 26 Apri12004 reply to correspondence from the Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology of 6 January 2004. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.