My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22932
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22932
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:28 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:17:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/1/1998
Doc Name
EVALUATION OF BEAR 3 MINE LANDSLIDE
Violation No.
CV1997022
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of Bear No. 3 Mine Landslide <br /> <br />Rocky Mountain Geotechnical report. The findings of this block glide analysis aze consistent <br />with eazlier Rocky Mountain Geotechnical studies in 1986 which indicate adeep-seated failure <br />scenarios in the bedrock have relatively high calculated factors of safety. <br />The results of the previous geotechnical engineering analyses conducted in the vicinity of Bear <br />No. 3 Mine can be summarized as follows: <br />• Stability analyses utilizing laboratory shear strength data from the site indicate shallow <br />translational failures near the bedrock colluvial contact are the most likely failure <br />mechanism. <br />• Hydrostatic pressures assumed to be acting on bout the gliding block and the shallow <br />translational failures had a relatively small effect on the overall factor of safety obtained <br />in the stability analyses. <br />Figure 8 presents a plan and cross section view of the subject slide based on available <br />topographic information and field measurements. The cross section depicts an upper section of <br />the slide which has translated dovvnslope resulting in a dilated and over-steepened middle section <br />of the hillside which was measured at 50° from the horizontal during our field visit. This over- <br />steepened section of the slope is metastable and continues to ravel releasing rock fragments <br />which roll to the toe of the slope. <br />Figure 8 also contains a plot of factor of safety against slope angle from a translational slope with <br />no seepage. This plot was developed from data in the 198? Rocky Mountain Geotechnical report <br />on the nearby colluvial slopes on Sections A and D in the vicinity of the Beaz No. 3 portal. Two <br />curves are presented on the plot. One represents peak shear strengths and the second residual <br />shear strengths. Based on the available topography, we estimated the slope angle to be about 39° <br />prior to the most recent landslide movement. Superimposing this original angle on the plot <br />results in factors of safety of less than one for the upper section of the hill at the landslide <br />location. <br />831-032.411 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.