My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV10616
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV10616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:20:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:14:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/11/2002
Doc Name
FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN4
From
DMG
Type & Sequence
RN4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Within this syncline there are numerous smaller folds generally trending southeast in the permit <br />area. The permit azea occupies the western, steeper flank of the asynunetrical Johnny Moore <br />syncline, which plunges to the south. The McCallum anticline is located just to the west, and <br />pazallels the permit azea. The dip of the coal within the permit area ranges from 45° to 86° to the <br />east and northeast, averaging 68°. Two faults intersect the permit azea along Bush and Williams <br />Draws. These strike from southwest to northeast and have a displacement of 100 to 150 feet. <br />The Marc Strip Mine produced coal from the Sudduth seam, a seam ranging from 35 to 75 feet in <br />thickness, averaging 50 feet. This seam is the lowest coal found in the 5000-foot-thick Tertiary <br />Coalmont Formation. Shale overlies the Sudduth seam, while a 50-foot-thick, fine-to-medium <br />grained sandstone lies between the coal and the underlying Pierre Shale. Quaternary alluvium of <br />sand, gravel, clay, dune sand, and glacial till is found along the creeks and rivers in the azea. <br />Geochemical Analysis of Overburden and Underburden <br />Kerr Coal Company drilled many holes within the permit area and conducted toxicity analysis of <br />the overburden and underburden. A total of 67 samples were taken from 18 drill holes. Dissimilar <br />lithologies were sampled at five-foot intervals and analyzed for potential toxicity. The azea] <br />sampling density was a minimum of one hole every 1300 feet. Other drill hole sample analyses <br />were available from the USGS and the BLM for azeas in and azound the permit area. Kerr sampled <br />and interpreted the results using the published guidelines of the Wyoming Department of <br />Environmental Quality and the Montana Department of State Lands, Reclamation Division. <br />Interpretation of [he analysis indicated no overall overburden or underburden toxicities. Some of <br />the analyses showed a few values that exceeded the suspect levels identified in the guidelines from <br />one or the other of the two States. Levels for nickel were marginally in the suspect range <br />(Wyoming guidelines). The overburden was found to be alkaline, however, and nickel in the <br />concentration ranges found at the mine would, according to certain studies, not suggest plant or <br />hydrologic toxicity problems. Some sample analyses showed marginal potential toxicities for <br />selenium. Of 54 samples taken, 12 exceeded the suspect level (Wyoming guidelines). Of these 12 <br />samples, eight came from holes drilled with mud. This was believed to suggest that some <br />contamination had occurred. The remainder of the samples that showed elevated levels represents <br />12.7 percent of the overburden volume. Studies conducted by the federal government show that up <br />to 20 percent of potentially toxic material in a truck-and-shovel operation would be diluted to <br />acceptable levels. <br />Twenty-three of the samples exceeded the Montana guidelines suspect levels for molybdenum. <br />Wyoming does not have a suspect level for molybdenum. Studies indicate that a field occurrence <br />of toxicity does not exist with respect to molybdenum. All surface water and groundwater samples <br />evaluated by the mine aze below the detection limit. <br />SAR values in 38.6 percent of the samples were above the suspect level of 15 described in the <br />Wyoming guidelines. The weighted average value is 8.74. Many of the samples were con- <br />taminated with drilling mud, drilling foam, or other drilling fluid. Kerr cited a study that showed <br />that drilling fluids dramatically increase SAR values above samples taken from highwall or drilled <br />with air. None of the drillholes were drilled using air; therefore, all samples were deemed <br />Marr Mine Permit Renewal 04 11 January, 2002 <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.