My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22694
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22694
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:21 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:14:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/4/1993
Doc Name
APPENDIX Q SECTION XXVIII SNOWMELT CALCULATIONS
Violation No.
CV1998003
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11-2 <br />Methods of Estimation <br />??eeional analysis <br />This method is one of the moat uaefUl for snowmelt floods. See Chapter <br />for details of the method. <br />Decree-day method. uneaeed watersheds <br />This method is widely used because of its adaptability to usual data <br />conditions. Similar methods going into more detail are available but <br />seldom applicable because of lack of required data. <br />The degree lay method uses the equation: <br />M=KD (1 <br />where M = the watershed snowmelt in inches per day. <br />K = a constant that varies with watershed and climatic coalition: <br />D = the number of degree-days for a given day. <br />A 3eeree~av is a day with an average temperature one degree above 32° F. <br />Maximum and mini+mn,+ temperatures, as found in "Climatological Data," are <br />averaged to get the daily average temperature. A day with an average of <br />40° F. gives eight degree-days; with an average of 51° F., nineteen <br />degree days. The general form of the method is given below. A working <br />arrangement of the data is shown on table 11-1. In most cases the table <br />can be condensed. The steps iu the method are: <br />1. Using precipitation stations or snow survey data, show either <br />(a) the total available eater equivalent at the beginning of <br />the melt season (table 11-1) or (b} the precipitation and the <br />water equivalent by days (table 11-2). The first proceiure is <br />used where there is generally only one melt period per year; the <br />second, where melt periods occur intermittently through the <br />winter end spring. Water equivalent is the depth of eater, is <br />inches, that results from melting a given depth of snow, and <br />it is dependent on both depth and density of snow. Snow <br />surveys give field determinations of water equivalents. Where <br />such surveys are not made, it is customary to use one-tenth of <br />the snow 3epth as the depth of water equivalent. <br />2. For temperature stations in tie uaterahe3, tabulate average <br />temperatures for the melt perlods. (Note: ma~"+++m and <br />minimum values as given in "Climatological Data" can be <br />averaged aentally to avoid tabulation of averages below <br />33° F.) <br />f`.~~•v wY`~ fA~^ <br />~'~~: <br />jf~vi~~ V.> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.