My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV10501
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV10501
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:16:31 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:13:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/6/1987
Doc Name
Final Report Bird-Vegetation Associations
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />page-10 <br /> <br />warblers, MacGillivray's warblers, westerr. tanagers, dark-eyed <br />juncos, and brown-headed cowbirds) were observed on aspen and <br />mountain shrub habitats but were absent from reclaimed sites; <br />whereas sapsuckers, woodpeckers, western wood-pewees, tree <br />swallows, hermit thrushes, and yellow-rumped warblers were found <br />only on aspen habitats. Although total bird density was greater <br />on aspen than interior aspen habitats, only western wood-pewees, <br />house wrens, and downy woodpeckers were more numerous on aspen <br />habitats. <br />Total bird density on aspen habitats was high in 1985 and is <br />compared in Table 5 with densities found in 1986. Downy <br />woodpeckers, yellow-rumped warblers, western tanagers, and <br />Cassin's finches were more numerous in 1985 than in 1986. <br />Although considerable differences occurred in species such as <br />house wrens and warbling vireos, the difference was not <br />significant (P=0.05). <br />Bird densities on the two reclaimed sites were very similar <br />between years, and only white-crowned sparrows (a very law <br />density bird) indicated a difference between years (Table 6). <br />Bird densities on aspen and reclaimed sites for 1985-86 are <br />compared in Table 7. Fourteen bird species were more abundant on <br />aspen, whereas four were more abundant on reclaimed sites. Birds <br />of seven guilds were more abundant on aspen, while ground <br />nesters-ground feeders were similar on both habitats. <br />The number of aspen trees/acre was moderately correlated with <br />the number of serviceberry (r=0.60) and chokeberry (r=0.57) <br />trees. Several species of birds had correlation coefficients <br />(r>0.50) with all three habitat variables (table 8). This <br />probably indicates the importance of multi-layer canopies in bird <br />communities. Gambel oak was negatively correlated with aspen <br />(r=-0.30). Six species of birds had correlation coefficients <br />(r>0.50) with the number of oak trees/acre and probably reflect a <br />preference for oak habitats. Only three species of birds <br />indicated a preference for high forage production; vesper sparrow <br />(r=0.76), song sparrow (r=0.57), and western meadowlark (r=0.56). <br />CONCLUSION <br />There was mottle difference~in bird species densities on <br />reclaimed and aspen si es in 1985 and 1986, and the results of <br />this study should provide information relating to bird <br />composition changes if the aspen on Little Middle Creek is <br />removed. Data are presented on bird densities on reclaimed, <br />aspen, and mountain shrub habitats. <br />If the aspen is removed and reclamation is similar to the <br />reclaimed sites, habitat for several birds would-be affected. <br />The tree pads within the reclaimed sites provided some habitat <br />for several woodland birds (American kestrel, northern flicker, <br />American crow, house wren, mountain bluebird, and American <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.