My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV10454
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV10454
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:15:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:12:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985029
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/24/1990
Doc Name
MEMO-ALMA PLACER AMENDMENT FN M-85-128
From
MLRD
To
LARRY OEHLER
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii • <br />999 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.. Room 2t5 <br />Denver. CO 60203 <br />303 8663567 <br />Fnx 303 632~6t06 <br />pF Cp4J <br />~~"~~~> <br />N S, (((A'''''--~)~~ ~,~ <br />/F ]6 <br />DATE: May 24, 1990 <br />T0: Larry Oehler <br />FROM: Steve Renne~~ `! -- <br />RE: Alma Placer Amendment <br />(file M-85-128) <br />Fo. Rm~ <br />Govemo' <br />Feo F 8anu <br />D~nsion D~renor <br />Based upon ~ review of the Technical Revision application, odequa y concerns <br />regarding the Pond 1 embankment have been ioentified. Reclamation kesources <br />should address these concerns as well as those in our May 22, 1490 letter, by <br />no later than June 8, 1990. I would also suggest that other point which were <br />to be stipulated to be resolved by June 8, 1990. <br />1. The pond embankment stability analysis should be reevaluated. The new <br />analysis should be based upon site specific information obtai ed by <br />coring the embankment. Visual observations relating to pond ischaroe <br />along the embankment outslope should also be aoaressed. All ssumptions <br />regarding permeability, porosity, angle of friction, cohesion etc. should <br />be documented in the report. <br />2, Engineering diagrams and cross sections of the embankment ire is <br />reconfigures condition should be submitted. In addition, new pond volume <br />calculations should also be submitted, based upon the reconfi ured <br />embankment. <br />... It has been reported that as much as one cubic foot per secon (CFS) was <br />observed to leak through the embankment. The Act at 34-32-11 (4)(c) <br />requires that an applicant demonstrate compliance with applic ble state <br />and federal regulations. A one CFS discharge through the emb nkment does <br />not appear to comply with the standards of the Clean Water Ac at <br />440.148(b). The applicant should thoroughly address how the and will be <br />sealed in order to minimize percolation into the alluvium or he <br />embankment. <br />SGR/yjb <br />/43Uf I <br />sTA~ d~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.