My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22447
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22447
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:11 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:10:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000053
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/8/2005
Doc Name
formal complaint letter
From
dmg
To
daneil ellison
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Survey Continued -Page 2 <br />The depth of burial in the cemetery is another unknown factor If the overburden is only <br />three to four feet thick, then the bottom of the grave would have to penetrate two to three feet of <br />the boulder gravel to reach the depth of six feet. Since there is no evidence that the gravel bed <br />was penetrated because of the lack of piled stones on the surface, except for those already <br />mentioned, then it must be assumed that the overburden is over six feet thick or the graves were <br />dug only four to five feet deep. <br />The planned gravel mining operation will cause a pit up to fifteen feet deep to be dug on <br />the south and west sides of the cemetery. This will change the surface drainage of the cemetery <br />fi-om a northerly flow to a new south and west drainage pattern on the south and west sides, <br />Regardless of the new slope of the reclamation area, an increase of erosion will occur especially <br />on the south side, which could erode into the cemetery possibly exposing shallow graves. <br />The mining plan presented by the operator and investigated by Mr. Waldron seems to be <br />well planned and has taken most everything into consideration. Therefore, I offer the following <br />comments as a constructive measure to help prevent the exposure of any grave in the cemetery. <br />1. The at+ea will have considerable vehicle activity. It is recommended that a permanent <br />fence be erected around the cemetery, so that no roads or activity of any kind can take place in <br />the cemetery. <br />2. Any isolated boulder or group of boulders or rock slabs lying on the surface should be <br />suspect of a grave site. <br />3. The new south drainage away from the cemetery should be carefully monitored so that <br />erosion does not extend notthward back into the cemetery. <br />With the mining plan now in existence and with proper observation and maintenance, the overall <br />project should be acceptable to all parties. <br />SUBMF~TI'ToED- this 18/th d/ay of April, 2005. <br />Robert A. Doak, Jr. <br />Geologist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.