Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiuiiiiiiiuiii~ ~,~.~; ,: ;,... <br />_ 999 <br />~. \ ~. <br />ENERGY.INCORPORATED IVEp <br />SOUTHBRIDGE EAST 6130 SOUTH MEMORIAL <br />TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74133 (918) 252-5033 AUG 2 3 1990 <br />August 20, 1990 Mined Land <br />Reclamation Division <br />Mr. Dan T. Matthews <br />Mind Land Reclamation <br />1313 Sherman St. Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 ~ _ <br />Dear Mr. Matthews, <br />I have gone through the required revisions for the h:idterm review and hope to <br />clarify some of the areas which you have listed in your latest letter. <br />I do apologize for not responding earlier, but as we have discussed before, <br />there are a lot of points to address. I spoke with Mr. Stevens at the mine <br />site and told him that I have been working through the review, and didn't think <br />the review could be covered by the 15th, and he didn't think there would be a <br />problem, as long as we were making headway. <br />The points have been looked at and a great deal of work is being done on site. <br />I do believe that we can get this in technical form in the next few months but <br />not before. The reason being that with all of the work being done, it would be <br />foolish to do the work out of sequence. I will have a follow up on these <br />issues two weeks from now. <br />(1) The residency requirements stated in Rule 5.03.4(3)(B) and (C). As acting <br />agent and Vice-President of L&L Energy, I do meet these requirements. In <br />the regulation it states that the agent must have residency in the state <br />of operation. This is in compliance, because I am still.a Colorado <br />resident. I can send proof by sending a copy of Colorado tax forms or a <br />copy of my driver's license. I believe these documents should be <br />adequate. <br />(2) Section 2.03.5. The section is not clear as far as the information you <br />are asking for. The violations have been listed. Blue Flame Coal Company <br />has been "cited" with NOV-C-009 and NOV-C-88-037 which were related to the <br />drainage control plan as well as the sediment pond. This violation was <br />directed to the berm placement and ditch sizes, as well as rip-rapping the <br />ditches because of the degree of slope. This issue with rip-rapping the <br />drainage ditches was found to be at fault with Mike Savage. He wrote part <br />of the violation for improper rip-rapping and when you came out to the <br />site you advised against it. You said that the steep slopes were made up <br />of sandstone and did not need to be rip-rapped. However, the sediment <br />pond was also in question as to its size and capacity to hold the run off <br />for the ten year, twenty-four hour storm. The pond and the drainage <br />control plan has been constructed and are now in compliance to all <br />pertinent regulations. <br />