|
..
<br />~o
<br />1990, 1991 AND 1992 AHR REVIEW Page 2 h ~
<br />S S
<br />G~' ~
<br />a second sample were taken at that point in time, it would not { S=
<br />correlate to the prescribed sampling window or other samples ,~` ~"'
<br />previously obtained. t u
<br />They have requested a revision to their monitoring program to ~Cc ,
<br />eliminate this requirement and to a full suite analysis once
<br />a year in the fall (September).
<br />-:MCC will continue to do seasonal monitoring, but wi
<br />U ~~tij~~\~ sample for pH, conductivity, and temperature where previously ,,, „
<br />~. ~~ data for surface water, springs, and ground water was r~,t ~
<br />~.` ~ collected for pH, conductivity, , mperatu ~ ved o en, h~: '.,,,,~~
<br />eY~ and tur idity in the field an S, TSS, total iron, d tot 1` S~,r~~,
<br />~c mangane~en the lab. ++'
<br />LL..cc~~ `4b~( kb~lG,~PI, 5bo/1~1 ~e{c.l~l
<br />v5'1 The annual analy~es for surface water' sites will include
<br />~~ JA' laboratory analysis of pH, conductivity, TDS, TSS, calcium,
<br />~~ ~ magnesium, sodium, SAR, hardness bicarbonate, chloride,
<br />G r^y{~ nitrate/nitrite, phosphate O4_3 as P), sulfate, iron (total
<br />~~~~~ 1~ and dissolved), manganese (total and dissolved), aluminum
<br />(dissolved), arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury,
<br />,y+`' molybdenum, seleni and-zi7ts. All of the parameters will be
<br />5~ Lanai-yzed--f~thei otal fo unless stated otherwise.
<br />l',,a~V~ ~o~a~ JLIUY~^J,~h~L W~1~~H vvON{, dI~CW (U1MPd'n5~'"'
<br />The annual analyses for ground water sites will includeDVU~~~n
<br />laboratory analysis of pH, conductivity, TDS, TSS, calcium,
<br />magnesium, sodium, SAR, hardness, bicarbonate, chloride, un- pp`'~:
<br />ionized ammonia, nitrate nitrite, phosphate (PO4_3 as P), \'J
<br />sulfate, iron (total and dissolved), manganese (total and \~
<br />dissolved), arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, selenium and .1~
<br />zinc. All parameters will be analyzed for their ~,e#~ai forme
<br />unless stated otherwise. y r,rY,r•.. ~•.• lean/ ,..e1~,~5 ~~o,~ ~~s,1,,.J~ , '~~
<br />Is this revised monitoring plan acceptable? c~~3Solvn~
<br />~-
<br />3. My question to MCC (#9, Groundwater):
<br />Conductivity should be somewhat higher than total dissolved
<br />solids (TDS); however, samples collected from SOM 128H show
<br />TDS being 10 times higher than conductivity. Also, the permit
<br />states that baseline for the TDS in the Rollins formation is
<br />between 500-1500 mg/1 and TDS currently is between 8000-9000
<br />mg/1. Please provide an explanation as to why the TDS is
<br />above baseline data. The Division recommends that a full
<br />suite sample be taken and analyzed for this well.
<br />Since the well was drilled, the water level has increased
<br />approximately 175 feet. Please provide an explanation as to
<br />why this is occurring.
<br />
|