Laserfiche WebLink
.,4 <br />Y <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii ~`~~ <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Dlreetor <br />May 1, 1987 <br />Mr, Robert Hagen <br />Albuquerque Field Office <br />Office of Surface Mining <br />625 Silver Avenue, S.W. <br />Suite 310 <br />Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 <br />RE: G.E,C. Minerals - Ten-Day Notices, File No. C-81-037 <br />Dear Mr, Hagen: <br />This letter addresses the disposition of the Ten-Day Notice (TDN) No. <br />X-87-02-250-001, issued to Colorado on March 30, 1987. As I emphasized during <br />our telephone discussions after the TDN was issued and during our meeting of <br />April 16, 1987, the circumstances surrounding this case do not fit neatly into <br />the normal modes of enforcement. The history of the case is discussed below <br />followed by our recommendation that you find our response to the TDN <br />appropriate. <br />G,E.C. Minerals' permit was revoked by the Mined Land Reclamation Board on <br />October 25, 1984. At that time the Board ordered G.E.C. to conduct <br />reclamation in accordance with an approved schedule. Also reclamation <br />operations were to be conducted in accordance with the performance standards. <br />The Board held bonds at that time in the amount of 5725,000.00, and the bonds <br />were not forfeited due to the permittee's willingness and demonstration that <br />he could complete the reclamation. <br />the Division was not satisfied that G.E.C. would be able to meet the <br />requirements of the Board order given the pace at which reclamation was <br />occurring. Although it was not clear that G.E.C. had violated the Board <br />order, it was evident in 1986 that G.E.C. would fail to meet the schedule <br />unless certain activities commenced. One of the factors for the lack of <br />progress was that G.E.C. was negotiating an agreement with Energy Fuels <br />Corporation (EFC) to allow EFC to dispose of coal processing waste in the East <br />Pit. The idea had potential benefits for both parties and the state, and if <br />it came to fruition a modification in the reclamation schedule would be <br />necessary. G.E,C. delayed reclamation progress which would interfere with the <br />development of the agreement. <br />The Division monitored the site for compliance with the Board order. In 1986 <br />Concerned about the lack of reclamation progress yet aware of a potentially <br />beneficial agreement being negotiated, the Division scheduled a hearing before <br />the Board on October 23, 1986, to discuss the Board order, Among the items to <br />be placed on the agenda for discussion was forfeiture of bond if GEC could not <br />demonstrate an ability to comply with the Board order. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />