My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22142
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:06:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
3/2/1994
Doc Name
MEMO LETTER FROM CORE LABORATORIES
From
RCG HAGLER BAILLY
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />'~~~ <br /> CORE LABORAITORIES <br />Western Alias <br />International <br />tL~a~66 Cmy"Y <br /> i ~+ <br />February 2, 1994 <br /> FER ~ 19~ <br />Ms. Ann Maest <br />RCG Hagler/Bailly <br />P.O. Drawer 0 " ~~ 1. _ <br />~._:~. <br />Boulder. CO 80306 <br />Dear Ms. Maest: <br />As you requested during our phone conversation last week, this letter is written to larify our quality <br />wntrol reporting procedures. As I indicated, laboratory batch quality control data is ported on an "as <br />analyzed" basis (i.e. within calibration range at the instrument level). A quality control footer page <br />provided with all final reports includes a comment section which explains this reporting policy (see <br />attached). <br />Laboratory batch quality control data is reported in this manner for several reasons, All parameters <br />utilizing instrument calibrations include multiple quality control samples which are aqu us and could not <br />be reported with non-aqueous sample batches since the units reported would be differe t. Additionally, <br />the detection limit specified in the quality control report applies to all samples in thel QC batch. This <br />detection limit, if multiplied through due to dilution, digestion, or sample preparation d~rocedures, varies <br />considerably by sample and matrix type. For multiple parameters (all ICP and G1~AA metals), our <br />laboratory processes the raw lab data produced on the instrumentation directly into the Laboratory <br />Information Management System (LIMB) which produces the final report. This procedure requires that <br />quality control data be reported "as analyzed" at the instrument level. <br />The three cyanide samples in question (932003-4 T-CN, 932003 WAD CN, and X32003-6 T-CN) <br />required dilutions of 4, 4, and 2 times, respectively, to quantitate the cyanide w~thin the method <br />calibration range. The upper calibration standard for cyanide analysis is 0.50 mg/I.. These dilutions aze <br />reflected in the elevated detection limits reported for each sample. All other cyanide sa~ttples on this job <br />were low enough to be quantitated within the calibration range without dilution and are deported with the <br />normal 0.02 mg/L detection limit. <br />Please feel free to contact me at (303) 751-1780 if you need additional information or hive any questions <br />concerning this response. <br />Respectfully, <br />Linda L. Bankers <br />QA/QC Coordinator II <br />Analytical Chemistry Division <br />Attachment <br />cc: Ron Fuller -Laboratory Manager <br />10703 Ea51 Bethany Dnve Aurora. Colprado 800142696. (3031 751 a 780. Fax (303) 7514 784 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.