REV09473 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

applicable, as opposed to leaving the entry blank. In its February 11, 1998 submittal, Trapper stated that "0" will be used for future annual reports, for those entries where there is no flow. The Division considers this issue to be resolved. 9. OSM was interested in examining the Division's review of the 1996 Annual Hydrology Report. The Division's first adequacy review letter, dated July 15, 1997, and the Division's second adequacy review letter, dated December 9, 1997, have been sent to OSM previously. With the submittal of this letter, unless OSM has any concerns, the Division believes that this issue has been satisfied. FIELD ISSUES 10. Several exceedences of holding times had been observed in some of the laboratory analyses. The December 9, 1997 letter detailed this issue. The Division believes that this issue has been resolved. 11. The flume below the Coyote pond and the flume in the Flume Gulch drainage needed to be leveled. The Division believes that this issue has been resolved, as stated in the December 9, 1997 letter. 12. Trapper was asked to come up with another method of sampling the flow from springs and seeps, rather than by measuring the flow at a one foot wide throat parshall flume. Trapper set up a new sampling procedure for springs and seeps, as detailed in the December 9, 1997 letter. The Division considers this sampling method appropriate and that the issue has been resolved. 13. This item involved a discussion of points of compliance for water quality standards and did not require Trapper to submit any revised material. 14. Trapper had been requested to include "dozer basins." in the permit application. As had been explained in the December 9, 1998 letter, Trapper had submitted and obtained Division approval of Technical Revision No. 73 for the inclusion of "dozer basins" into the permit application. The Division believes this resolves the concern.