My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_ENFORCEMENT - M1978352 (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1978352
>
_ENFORCEMENT - M1978352 (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2022 2:33:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:04:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978352
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
AFFIDAVIT OF MARK A HEIFNER 79-CV-1633
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1RW: Ok we've heard the arguments, is there any further response <br /> 2 from Nottingham on this? [Silence. ] Ok, well this gets a <br /> 3 little bit . . . yeah . . . . <br /> 4MC: What I 'd like to point out to the Board is I guess without <br /> 5 addressing each one of these points which Mr. Goldstein has <br /> 6 raised, just to take for example, the NPDES permit, the Co. <br /> 7 Dept. of Health has been consulted and as I understand, <br /> 8 correct me if I 'm wrong Mark, they have in fact informed you <br /> 9 there is no requirement for an NPDES. <br /> JOG: Can we clarify that, has . . . has the Colorado State Board <br /> 11 been consulted with in giving you directly any . . . <br /> 12MH: They haven' t to me, but there' s no proposal for any discharge <br /> 13 in the operation, so there is no need for it, for an NPDES <br /> 14 permit. Many sand and gravel operations are operating in <br /> 15 this way, there is no discharge. <br /> 16MC: I guess what I just would like to get back to, is Mark 's <br /> 17 point that the staff has in fact reviewed the application and <br /> 18 as I understand it that his recommendation, they feel the <br /> 19 reclamation plan is in fact adequate in that it is strong and <br /> 20 based upon the recommendation of the staff, who have had an <br /> 21 adequate opportunity to review the plan, that the permit can <br /> 22 be approved. And there are fundamental questions on fairness <br /> 23 here in the sense that these objections are being raised <br /> 24 literally at the eleventh hour where there' s overwhelming <br /> 25 evidence that actual notice was in fact provided to an attor- <br /> 26 ney representing the Eagle River Trust and in fact that <br /> 27 attorney did make the objection which made it possible for <br /> 28 Mr. Goldstein to even appear here and make any statements in <br /> 29 this regard at all. I think based on that actual notice and <br /> -26- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.