Laserfiche WebLink
1 gravel operation is going to go in here. The fact of the <br /> 2 matter is that Eagle River Trust had actual notice. And <br /> 3 technical points can be raised but the fact of the matter is, <br /> 4 that actual notice was given to the Trust. <br /> 5G: Whether or not there may be some sort of general notice that <br /> 6 our operation was put in here, I am not in a position to con- <br /> 7 cede. Though even if I were to concede, that doesn' t answer <br /> a the point. I understand that Mr. Goldman and Mr. Nottingham, <br /> 9 it has been the indication that there was initial publication, <br /> 10 which I believe was made, and there was a faulty application. <br /> 11 Mr. Goldman I think spoke with Mr. Nottingham, if I understand <br /> 12 correctly about this, and Mr. Nottingham' s response was that <br /> 13 initial publication was in error. However, he wasn't aware <br /> 14 of it or its error whatever, there was a misfiling. There <br /> 15 was no subsequent communication or reference to that item and <br /> 16 it may have been in error, but the republication was never <br /> 17 noticed to our client so he may have been aware of it. He <br /> 18 was not aware of the dates and when this thing was going to <br /> 19 take place. I was only able to find out after some time that <br /> 20 the hearing indeed was going to occur on Thursday, the Gold- <br /> 21 mans live out of the state. We didn' t have an opportunity <br /> 22 for them to review this or, needless to say, for any landscape <br /> 23 architect or engineers which they might want to employ to <br /> 24 look this application over, to review this. Without object- <br /> 25 ing to its merits, we need the time to take a look at this. <br /> 26MH: One thing I wanted to say there' s two notices to adjacent <br /> 27 landowners that were sent. out, one to Rio Grande Railroad and <br /> 28 the other to Brush Creek and Eagle River Company, both of <br /> 29 them were received by the parties they were sent to on Janu- <br /> -20- <br />