Laserfiche WebLink
1 seems to me that this is outside of the Permit application. <br /> 2 RW: Yes, that' s what Mark recommended, i think. <br /> 3C: Well, what I would like to stress I think is that you con- <br /> 4 sider the impact that it could have on the ecology, environ- <br /> 5 ment, so on. I would like to say that an accident, a serious <br /> 6 derailment, here could have a very, very serious impact on <br /> 7 the ecology and environment were a common carrier, we carry a <br /> 8 number of things, you can' t pick and choose what you carry, <br /> 9 you can go about any direction I don' t want to say that <br /> 10 something will happen there' s a very great possibility that <br /> 11 it could happen. <br /> 12RW: I think what Mr. Sullivan is conveying is the idea that there <br /> 13 is a certain point beyond which we have no authority, and the <br /> 14 reason we have no responsibility in a sense. What we' re <br /> 15 presented with here is the approximate nature of the parti- <br /> 16 cular question. Rahter than crossing where they're hauling <br /> 17 some materials so I have some sympathy to but the rest of it, <br /> 18 but I have to come back to where you are and say that it is <br /> 19 really not our problem. There may be other entities that are <br /> 20 in a better position to deal with this than I but I, then the <br /> 21 Board. What is the response . . . . you've gotten no response <br /> 22 from Nottingham, that' s what you' re saying. <br /> 23C: We have had response from Nottingham up to a point we've had <br /> 24 some hearing in Eagle County and so on but there hasn' t been <br /> 25 anything concrete yet that' s been determined about this <br /> 26 particular crossing. We have upgraded the crossing as I said <br /> 27 and we' re going to bill Nottingham for the expense of upgrad- <br /> 28 ing this crossing. <br /> 29 JS : To a degree then if you're going to bill them for the expense <br /> -12- <br />