My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE21911
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE21911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:49 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:03:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983084
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
4/17/1996
Doc Name
NOV M-96-009 AND CEASE AND DESIST ORDER
Violation No.
MV1996008
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'. <br />order to lower their bond <br />(See Exhibit C) The permit amendment <br />was granted, but the severe disturbance area was never changed, <br />and was simply left inactive. On May 1993, an inspection of the <br />Division occurred. The inspection did not hold M&M in violation. <br />M&M was unable to make its agreed upon payments to Zigan and <br />Zigan foreclosed. (See Exhibit D). When the foreclosure was <br />completed, Zigan re-entered the premises and recommenced mining. <br />Zigan did not increase the area of severe disturbance over and <br />above the area which was disturbed when Zigan took title to the <br />property. <br />On September 28, 1995, an inspection was held wherein the <br />state discovered that the severe area of disturbance was in <br />excess of the 2.1 acres. (~ Exhibit E) Zigan was notified of <br />this on January 19, 1996. (fie Exhibits F and G) <br />On February 20th, Zigan submitted an application to the <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division to increase the area of severe <br />disturbance to 8 acres. [Exhibit H]. The application has been <br />awaiting action by the Division since that date. <br />On January 19, 1996, Zigan was cited for failure to perform <br />reclamation as prescribed by the reclamation plan and an <br />inadequate bond. All of the violations, in whole or in part, <br />related to the issue of the severe disturbance area. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.