ENFORCE21782 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Intervenors may be adversely affected or aggrieved by any determination that the JD-6, JD-8, or JD-9 mines do not qualify for DMO status, as requested by the Cotter Corporation. These uranium mines have a problematic history ofnon-compliance and problems that require fully informed and transpazent regulatory decisions. Intervenors intend to participate in the additional procedural opportunities that are provided by the heightened regulatory standazds for mines with DMO status. Factual Background The JD-6, JD-8, and JD-9 mines ("JD Mine Complex") aze part of afederally-leased uranium mine complex operated by Cotter Corporation. Federal agency records indicate that these mining operations aze included in a Department of Energy ("DOE") tract leased to Cotter Corporation on or about 1995 for a term of 10 yeazs that either has expired. Publicly available federal and state records indicate that intermittent exploration and mining have taken place on these federally leased uranium deposits for neazly forty years. Public records indicate that buildings and structures, mine-waste rock piles, adits/inclines, vents, drill roads, drill holes, petroleum tanks, dewatering equipment, and retention ponds aze found on site. In addition to state regulation under the MLRA and the terms contained in the federal lease, activities that take place on the JD Mine Complex aze subject to federal laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act and are subject to the oversight responsibilities of the Department of Energy and the Bureau of Land Management. Activities regazding JD Mine Complex may also implicate the Endangered Species Act due to federal records indicating the presence of protected species, including the listed southwestern willow flycatchers, on the actual lease tracts. Public records also indicate that the JD Mine Complex is located in important mule- deer winter habitat and that Bald Eagles are located in the area. Several species of protected bats are also likely found on, in, or neaz the JD uranium mines. Public records recognize that human health of both workers and the general public may be impacted by exposure to both radiological and nonradiological hazazds on the lease tracts. These mines aze located on federal public lands that, although leased, remain open to multiple use by the public. These mines have been operating sporadically since first obtaining MLRB permits in 1970s and early 1980s. The DRMS files indicate that for much of that time, approximately 25 yeazs, these mines has been idle and in voluntary cessation status. Agency records, including those of Mine Safety Health Administration have identified multiple health and worker exposure violations at the JD mines. DRMS inspections have also documented concerns and problems at these mines. The DRMS report and analysis dated April 5, 2005 indicates that "contamination buildup of surface materials from prolonged use of an area may be an issue of concern" at all these mines. As a single example of the impacts, "major erosion has occurred" at the JD-6 Mine and the associated Mineral Joe Claims. During a recent, but brief period of active mining in 2005, "approximately 50 tons of materials was observed stockpiled" at the JD-6 mine to maximize haulage efficiency. At the JD-9 mine, "60 to 80 tons of ore [were] noted stockpiled" and ponds were "beginning to show their age."