My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV09292
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV09292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:09:48 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:01:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/24/1994
Doc Name
RESPONSES TO LETTERS OF FEBRUARY 22 1994 AND FEBRUARY 24 1994 BASIN RESOURCES INC THE GOLDEN EAGLE
From
DMG
To
ROBERT F T KRASSA
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Robert F. T. Krassa -2- Maroh 24, 1994 <br />surface tract is limited to extraction of the mineral under that particular property only. <br />Findings documents developed by our Division are prepared for the basis of <br />documenting that applications for permits and revisions are in compliance with the <br />regulations and thus approvable, and not for We purposes of making generalized legal <br />statements. <br />Rule 2.03.6(1) requires applications to contain only a description of the documents <br />upon which the applicant bases its legal right to enter and begin surface coal mining <br />operations in the permit area, and whether that right is the subject pending litigation. <br />This rule further requires the description to identify those documents by type and date <br />of execution, identify the specific lands to which the document pertains, and explain <br />the legal rights claimed by the applicant. The Golden Fagle Mine permit application <br />provides this, and our Findings Document affirms the operator's compliance. <br />3. Thank you for your comments regarding Stipulations 66 through 70. We have <br />appreciated the cooperation of all those involved in these proceedings. <br />~~~~ 4. The application materials required pursuant to Rule 2.05.3(2)(b) have been submitted. <br />We have asked Basin Resources to provide some revised exhibits that provide this <br />°"1~"6 ~ information in a more concise manner. When this revised information is submitted, <br />M ~ we will notify you. <br />5. Two issues appear to be discussed in this paragraph. The first is whether one of the <br />existing "test" holes on the north side of the Purgatoire River should be used as a <br />- groundwater monitoring well. <br />a Resources is developi~pe a vLin for monstoring-tl <br />be submitted soon. We will review their vlans as <br />ar7fidetenmme whether any additio~nitoring wells araneeded. We <br />you of the submittal of this'-in~ormafiou as soon as rt arrives. <br />S-r/ J' The second issue is whether any of We wells in Ure area of Rancho Escondido should <br />monitor the hydrologic characteristics of the Trinidad Sandstone specifically. <br />It was our understanding from the meeting held with Basin and Raton West on <br />February 23, 1994 that Raton West's concerns with impacts to the Trinidad Sandstone <br />were raised after reviewing Part 3 of Stipulation 67 in the Golden Eagle Findings <br />Document. The Division's request for a plan. to monitor the inflow into the <br />Golden Eagle Mine was based upon statements made in the Division's Findings <br />Document pursuant to the approval of the 1989 Permit Revision. In that document, it <br />was stated that water was flowing into the mine worlangs situated south of the <br />Purgatoire River. Water was apparently being transmitted to.the woridngs from <br />below via a geologic fault. The Division concluded in the 1989 Findings Document <br />that the source of this water was the Trinidad Sandstone, as no other <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.