My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE21694
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE21694
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:42 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:01:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/23/1994
Doc Name
FAX BASIN RESOURCES RATON WEST PN C-81-013 COMMENTS CONCERNING PROPOSED DECISION
From
KRASSA LINDHOLM KUMLI & MADSEN
To
DMG
Violation No.
TD1993020370005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Michael B. Long, Director <br />February 22, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />number should be assigned in conformance with the <br />Divisions numbering system. Such action is <br />appropriate in order to avoid any implication that <br />any conditions of the surface, structure inventory, <br />or rights of surface owners are limited or in any <br />other way affected by the 1981 date of the expired <br />permit for this mine. <br />2. Finding 6 on page 10 concerns the Right of Entry of the <br />Operator under certain deeds which are allegedly of <br />record in Las Animas County. The Division file does not <br />indicate that the Division has conducted any title work <br />or made any independent determination as to the extent of <br />any rights of access which the operator may have; rather, <br />the Division is simply relying on the implication under <br />the common law of the right of a severed mineral owner to <br />access the minerals. Of course, as you know, the right <br />to access minerals through any given surface tract is <br />limited to extraction of the mineral under that <br />particular property only. Finding 6 should be revised to <br />reflect this limitation, and to state that the Division <br />has not made an independent examination of the alleged <br />deeds. <br />3. Stipulations 66 - 70 are very close to what Raton West <br />has been requesting with regard to protection of the <br />interest of surface owners. The Division is to be <br />complimented for crafting these stipulations in a mariner <br />which should prove workable for both the operator and <br />overlying landowners. <br />4. We propose that an additional Stipulation be added to the <br />Golden Eagle permitting requirements. This added <br />Stipulation should call for the submittal by Basin of a <br />detailed narrative and appropriate map(s), sufficient to <br />describe all proposed surface disturbances to be <br />associated with the underground mining activities within <br />the permit areas, pursuant to Regulation 2.05.3(2)(b). <br />It is our understanding that such materials have not yet <br />been submitted by Basin in connection with the new Golden <br />Eagle Mine permit. <br />5. As to Stipulation 67, we propose that at least one of the <br />existing test holes constructed by Basin or its <br />Xnarsa, lirdhofm, XumG' 1r Aladrm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.