Laserfiche WebLink
n... ui ~v. ir. ao. ~ nr-_v- rr . _~~rq :r. r.> _o, .>..r~.e~ U. V. tiD. p <br />j <br />/~ r <br />r `~ , <br />P <br />a~ ti <br />~ M ~, <br />a aanr tutxio. <br />OFFICE OF HEARIIrGS AND APPEALS <br />In(enor Baud of Laud Appeals <br />40151Yilsou Boulevard <br />Arlington. Yuginia 22263 <br />Interi ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ f I ~ <br />JUL 2 8 2000 <br />OFFlCE C r' Tf+>r!lOIONA L SOLtC!'OH <br />fKT+VR1 COlORA00 <br />CEr~,Yi F I ED <br />JUL 2 6 X00 <br />United States Department of the <br />IHLA 96-908 <br />96-918 <br />151 D3IA 286 <br />JIM 6 A4IId TATCM <br />(Q1 RECLTS~ZCN) <br />No. CC-93-020-006 <br />Surface Mining Citizen's <br />Cc;aplaint <br />Petition for Reconsideration <br />Denied <br />On January 5, 2000, this Hoard issued a decision styled Jim ~ Ann <br />Tatum, 151 ISIA 226, in which we addressed separate appeals (IHLA 96-90 dtYl <br />96-91) filed by the Tatlm,S from tFA decisions of the Rxr;nnal Director, <br />Western Regional c'm*r1i*+ating Center. Office Of Stirfa,ce Mining R~~~+tirai <br />and E~tfprrsonar,r (pg~ ~ ~~ Augtst 29, 1995, and Sept®ber 18, 1995, <br />a.ffiaainq determinations of the Denver a~ Alblxp~p.~„A 0~I Field Offices <br />that the responses of the State of Colorado, Deoartment of Natural <br />Fesourees, Division of Mining and Geology (L23~fr %~ appropriate action in <br />re„~pca:se to Ter.-Day Notice (TII~ No. 93-020-370-005 issued by oEl~t. 013'! <br />issued the TIN to II~ follariruJ receipt of a citizen's acmplaint <br />(No. CC-93-020-008) fxbnt the TatultLS alleging that an ~~~+~*;**+~+~ mining <br />opetaticm aar~,r~pri by Basin RE9t7UrCe5, Inc. (13Fi2) lfonnerly, Wyoming Fua1 <br />CaBPanY), ~d ~-~d subsidence damage to their home near Weston, Colorado, <br />and damaged a livestock water well an their property. <br />OSH seeks *~*"+~idertion only of that part of our decision relating <br />to IHL,t+, 96-91, whidi addresses that portian of TLN No. 93-020-370-005 <br />rnnrnr++;n~ alleged subsidence-related violations by 13FtI. In that Fart of <br />our decision, we vacated the Regional Director's decision and the <br />underlying decision of the Albuquerque Field Office and remanded the case <br />to ~! for appropriate action. OSM also seeks a stay of crur decision <br />pending a decision oa its petition. <br />In a formal citizen cz~laint dated 2v'ove<nber 30, 1993, the Tattms5 made <br />various allegations, i~cl"~i„~ "Rule [2 Colo. Code Pegs.] 4.20 'Subsidence <br />Cantml' providing for protection of the surface ota~ers property and water <br />well appears to have been deliberately ignored. No monitoring of the <br />