ENFORCE21661

• Permit No: C1981013
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Name: WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS EXHIBIT A-U
• Violation No.: CV2000009
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

~,
o
m
a
a
N
J
M
~]
F
u
z
..
r
w
ff
z ~
,., N
s y
~u tt
F-
c K
3 w
F. r
x
ca
~ ~
~ a
m
a
e
~~
..
m
~o m
~~ t
m
t.~ N
o ~
1. ~
. N W
i LL
GO
)~
. u-.
NOTE: A LEVEL LOOP WAS RUN FEBRUARY 21, 2D01. TFIE INSTRUMENT USED WAS A LIETZ AUTOMATIC LEVEL
Y100EL NUMBEit 85906, B7A POINT "PT A' WAS USED AS TFE BEIiCJiWY4i((Fl = 7118.T2 FEET}.
NQTE •PT a wAS F0UId0 Ta eE BENT.
THAT
NOTE: WHEN WE CHECKED BJICK INTO PT,l~ IM1IE TIED BACK IN WRNW 0.01 FEET. ACCORDWG TO •TNE SURVEYING HAMD80O7i
ECXTED H Y RUSSEii Q BRWKER AND ROY IaAW/C/( YAN NOSTRAND RElNHOLD CWIPAAIY, J907, PAGE 798 TABLE 225, 7TIE
MAIOI~SUM CLOSURE FOR A SEAR, CLASS 1 VERTICAL SURVEY IS "8mm .1C, WFiF3TE K IS THE DISTANCE pV KILOMETERS.
W ITFi A BASELINE DISTANCE OF 0,7125 FEET OPE-WAY, THIS CALCULATES TO A MAXIMUM CLOSURE OF THE FOLLOWING:
barn ' /82725 FT • 2.0.00030.1001 KMt1R) _ '15~~200mR1' .00328 = 0AS tt
THE UNDERSIGNED REf313TERED PROFESSIONAL LANG SURVEYOR
CERTlFIEe THAT THRS INFORMATION WAS SURVEYED
UNDER WS SIIPERVlS1ON AND DII~CTION AND 18 CDRAECT
70 7HE~ii1'gpi~(~gKNDWLEpgE AND BELJEF
THE ELEVATION WAS CALCULATED IS NOT KNOW N 70 U6 AT THIS TIME.