My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV09199
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV09199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:09:43 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:00:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977140
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/16/1996
Doc Name
TR RESPONSE PERMIT M-77-140
From
MATHIAS CONC INC
To
JAMES DILLIE
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
02i16i96 1458 E 719052,jZ59 Mathias <br />.~. `~ ~ • <br />February 16, 1996 <br />James Dillie - Environmental~Protection Specialist <br />Division of Hinerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St. Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />1 <br />RE: Response to technical revision questions - PermitiF ri-77-140 <br />Mathias Concrete, Inc. (North Pit <br />Dear Mr. Dillie, <br />The following are the responses to your letter dated January 31, <br />1996. I will respond to them in the order that they were <br />received. <br />i. Total of 20.2 acres - ground water exposure ) <br />Currently we are exposing approximately 12 acres of surface <br />water. Any surface water exposed, prior to 1980 (approx. 9 <br />acres) was grandfathered in and does not apply to the substitute <br />water supply plan or our permanent plan for augmentation. <br />(The 20.2 figure represents the <br />will not occur for several years <br />included in our well permit No <br />Water Engineer on October 15, <br />permanent plan of augmentation <br />which is in process. <br />,+ <br />W <br />ultimate size of the pond which <br />in the future. This figure is <br />045537 approved by Lhe State <br />1995, nd will be used in our <br />throughthe local water Court, <br />2. Questions relating to financial warranLY <br />(A) Conveyor - We use 5 conveyors on our concrete and gravel <br />operation. The tail section and legs sit on concrete foundations <br />(which ~re approxim rely 10' x 5' x 1' thick. (3 per conveyor) <br />f The conveyors caa a silt' be taken down and the concrete bases can <br />also be easily move and us~d for bases for tanks etc. They are <br />sitting on top of ground and are not below ground level. <br />1 <br />(8) The wash pond "s approximately 75' x 25' x 5' and <br />periodically fills up with fine material. This material is <br />periodically excavated nd is sold for fill, pipe bedding, etc. <br />I <br />(C) The Foundation o~ Our concrete batch plant is 40' long by <br />20' wide and approximately ia" thick. The batch plant is a <br />portable plant that could be moved fairly easily. The building <br />it sets in would remain and be incorporated for storage of <br />equipment for farming or other operation. <br />i <br />(D) We would not remove our well currently used in washing <br />operations. We would incorporate it into agricultural operations <br />later on. <br />(7s') Power lines would not have to be moved because we would need <br />power for any future farming or residential uses. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br />~ Tom Hathias - President, Hathias Concrete, Inc. <br />P.02 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.