Laserfiche WebLink
<br />iii iiuiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />TELEPHONE LOG <br />FILE NO.: C-81-020 <br />OPERATOR: Wyoming Fuels <br />DATE: August 8, 1990 ~•~.,~2 <br />^ <br />C <br />SPECIALIST: ~^ <br />J <br />Cathy Begej <br />PERSON CONTACTED: Gene Dillashaw - BLM - Kremmling <br />SUBJECT: Canadian Bond Release <br />Mr. Dillashaw called August 8, 1990, to ask questions about the Canadian Strip <br />Mine. He had received a letter from Wyoming Fuels asking if BLM, as the <br />landowner of the southern part of the property, would be interested in <br />retention of Ponds 2 and 3 to support the post-mining land use, and if BLM <br />would support a lower woody plant density standard. Mr. Dillashaw had also <br />gone out to the site August 6, 1990 with Dave Cameron and Dave had discussed <br />their upcoming request to eliminate ground water monitoring activities at the <br />site. <br />I reviewed the Division's regulations on permanent impoundment criteria with <br />Mr. Dillashaw and suggest that Wyoming fuels would have a difficult time <br />meeting 4.05.9(1)(b) at Pond 2, which says that the water level would be <br />stable to support the intended use. Mr. Dillashaw indicated that any water <br />storage in North Park would benefit grazing, even if it was of an ephemeral <br />nature, and that he would support Wyoming Fuel's application for permanent <br />impoundment status of Pond 2. He felt that Pond 3 would silt in on its own <br />and that reclamation activities would provide unnecessary disturbance at the <br />site. I pointed out that Pond 3 held little water and had a very small <br />watershed, and that I would support reclamation of that site. He indicated he <br />would consider my recommendation in light of realistic post-mining land use. <br />Mr. Dillashaw was curious about the woody plant density standard. I told him <br />that the area had been identified as critical habitat for sage grouse and the <br />Colorado Department of Wildlife had been instrumental in the establishment of <br />that standard. Mr. Dillashaw indicated that since grazing was BLM's <br />predominant interest at the site they would support a decrease or elimination <br />of the woody plant density standard. I invited him to write a letter stating <br />their support of Wyoming Fuels application to reduce the woody plant density <br />standard. <br />Mr. Dillashaw said that he thought that well abandonment was a criteria for <br />their concurrence with bond release. I suggested that he review their <br />regulations and lease for the site, as I thought Wyoming Fuel was carrying a <br />b10,000 bond for the BLM. I also described the three phases of bond release, <br />and the criteria that were evaluated in each phase. I assured him that°,,Uond <br />for well abandonment would be retained if the Division made an assessment that <br />ground water monitoring should be continued for a longer period of time. <br />The last topic of concern was weed control at the site. I assured him that we <br />would strongly encourage the operator to control weeds throughout the ten-year <br />bonding liability period both to assure achievement of vegetation standards <br />and to manage their weeds according to our guidelines. <br />