My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE21528
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE21528
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:37 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:59:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978091UG
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/21/2002
Doc Name
Board Presentation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There is language in Rule 1.1(2) which distinguishes that materials which are stored-for less than 180 days are not <br />"stockpiled." However, the same rule includes an important element: it states that under certain situations, <br />consideration must be given to providing the appropriate measures to prevent impacts due to the runoff or leaching <br />of the weathered acid-generating material, even if stockpiling is for less than 180 days. This site exhibits a <br />potential for such impacts. <br />The facts of the stockpile site include the following: A) the ore storage area does not contain an impermeable <br />underlines; some of the affected surface is a gravel parking area and some of it was until recently grass-covered; <br />B) the ore is stored in woven "super sacks" which are permeable throughout and open on the top; the ore storage <br />area is not protected from the effects or results of precipitation; C) the ore storage area lies up-gradient and in close <br />proximity (all of the ore is within 100 feet, and some of it as close as I S feet) to a fishing pond; D) there have been <br />up to several hundred tons of ore stored here for months at a time; E) recent observations of this ore and the storage <br />area include the weathering of the ore in the sacks, mineral staining of the fabric of the sacks and the ground near <br />the sacks; and F) there is a complete lack of any drainage control of the area. <br />2: Following from the definitions cited above, and the conclusion that this stockpiling is an "activity" on "affected <br />land," please refer to Rule 1.1(19) "Facility." The ore stockpile area is one of the operation's facilities and must be <br />treated as such: with all necessary designed and constructed controls to adequately store this ore. <br />3. The reference to affected land in the paragraph above implies that the stockpile area be made part of the <br />permitted area, pursuant to Rule 3:1.12(2)(a). Activities which are determined to be mining-related, must occur <br />within the permitted area. If they are not, the situation becomes one of land being affected for which there is no <br />regulated limit on acreage or activity, no protection or control plan, no mining plan to adhere to, and no reclamation <br />standard or bond to ensure reclamation. <br />4. Since this site is a DMO, please refer to the definitions in Rule 1.1(14)(6), (c) and (e) "Designated Mining <br />Operation," Rule 1.1(15) "Environmental Protection Facility," and Rule 1.1(16) "Environmental Protection Plan." <br />These rules pertain to conditions inherent in your operation and the need for the appropriate controls. Since this <br />permit is a DMO, you have filed the required Environmental Protection Plan (EPP), which describes the control <br />structures and pmctices pertaining to activities within the permitted area boundary (the portals at the 3 and 6 levels). <br />However, there is no provision in the existing EPP for activities occurring outside the permit boundaries, <br />specifically, for potential or actual adverse impacts at Vickers Ranch. Onsite observations have shown the lack of <br />such controls. (Portions of this are reiterated in Section 112.5 of the Act.) <br />5. The basic requirements for control structures and practices aze stated in Rule 3.1.5(5) which describes protection <br />to the drainage system from acid producing materials. Additional language related to release of pollutants to the <br />surface or groundwater is set forth under Rules 3.1.5(10) and (11). (Portions of these rules are reiterated in Section <br />116(7)(c) and (d) of the Act.) <br />6. Part of your EPP for the permitted part of the operation involves groundwater monitoring, which you have been <br />carrying out up on Deadman Gulch. An operator's requirement to monitor and protect groundwater is set forth in <br />Rule 3.1.7. Since there has been no documented sampling of the water below the stockpile area at Vickers Ranch, <br />the baseline quality is unknown. Prior to your use of this area as a stockpile location, it is presumed that it was only <br />a pazking area and an adjacent grassy area. Future stockpiling in this area may require that water sampling be done <br />to ensure that the site is not adversely affected. If it is found that sampling is necessary and the occurrence of <br />metals or low pH is found, it might be attributable to your operation. <br />7. This stockpiling is appropriately considered to be part of the mining-related activities, and it must be made part <br />of the permitted area if it is to continue into the future. Therefore, please refer to Rule 6.3.2(c) which describes the <br />requirement for providing information about water resources, specifically including ponds which may receive <br />mnoff from an affected area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.