My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE21473
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE21473
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:34 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:58:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
EXHIBIT A to Exhibt L
Violation No.
CV1993112
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s•• <br />• IV. Entorcement AcLlons <br />, t,...~.:.,..... <br />~"~•The following ioentifies enforcement actions taken during this inspeCLion, the <br />' required abatement and date of abatement for the riotatton, previous violations <br />still requiring abatement and. the terminaLion of violations cited during previous <br />', inspections. , <br />Notice of Violation INU1') C-93-112 was issued Por failure to <br />properly notify surface land owners above underground workings and <br />adjacent areny 14.20.2(1-3 )). The operator did notify Grand Meae <br />Properties in .a letter dated December 13, 1984,, wlro at that time <br />owne,i three-quat•ters of Section 20. (Curry Mauta~~:ta now the <br />property ownerl, However, the lettex•provided to Grand Mesa stated <br />that mining way to begin February 1, 1886; provldin¢ only three <br />months notification. The regulations require notification at leant <br />six mon+tlx pr~or ~o m~ning ~ , Th.e „),,agter ilid specify the areas in <br />which min~ns would 'taker p1aC'e, b~+t rie¢Ylect.ed+ informati~a~n reyn~•disng <br />the dates of minl.ng activities that could cause aubsllence and <br />affect specific structures and the measures that would•be taken to <br />prevent or control .,ndverae surface effects. Ar, additional <br />landowner, the US Forest Service, was not provided an~r,~,~Q,tification <br />pursuant to the above referenced reg,ilation..In order to abate the <br />violation, the company Ss required to prepare and send h latter to <br />all affected landowners who ware not properly notified pursuant to <br />Rule 4.20.2(1-3), tiuPficierrt proof that the.latter was received 6y <br />' tt,e l:tr,downera should be provided to the Division. Tha Division <br />would au¢¢eat that 'MCC submit the latter to the Division for <br />' review, prior to sanding it to the landoxnera. <br />NUV C-9.i-113 was issued for failux•e to ottbmit proper permitting <br />documents pri.ot• to rclocating.topeail piles. These were two <br />topsoil piles located on either side oP the Sylvester Oulch road <br />that .ware moved ao,ratime lest fall to the caster„ elope oP the <br />refuse pile. Rule 4.08.3(21(b) apccifiaally statos that <br />"stockpiled topsoil and otlv_t• ma*_arixls ehs11 not 6e moved until <br />required Por radiytribution nu n regraded area unless approved by <br />-' •.t he Division"• Iit addition, tt,e new location oP these topsail <br />pile.a have not been located on the facilities mssp as .required b}• <br />Rule 2.05.3(61. In ordet• to abate the r•iolation, fife company is <br />x•rrquisied to p~•oVide tAe proper ,and tidequate p.ermitLirlg ;documents <br />pursuant Lo R,.tle 3.Oa.3(5). <br />NOTE: Attach approprlete VIOLATIONS OR CESSATION ORDER CODING FORMS <br />Revises: 4/88 <br />Doc. No. B101f <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.